PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFWTX vs. FTLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFWTX vs. FTLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFWTX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFWTX achieves a 4.64% return, which is significantly lower than FTLSX's 5.19% return.


FFWTX

1D
0.14%
1M
1.93%
YTD
4.64%
6M
4.74%
1Y
11.52%
3Y*
8.62%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
5.53%

FTLSX

1D
0.28%
1M
1.89%
YTD
5.19%
6M
5.44%
1Y
12.01%
3Y*
8.36%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFWTX vs. FTLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFWTX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.64%10.16%5.83%9.88%-12.97%5.15%10.45%14.36%-2.58%5.13%
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
5.19%10.31%4.72%8.60%-11.33%3.30%9.04%10.97%-1.40%3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FFWTX and FTLSX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.92

The correlation between FFWTX and FTLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFWTX vs. FTLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFWTX
FFWTX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FFWTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFWTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFWTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FFWTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFWTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FTLSX
FTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFWTX vs. FTLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFWTX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFWTXFTLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.55

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.32

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.10

14.65

-0.55

FFWTX vs. FTLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFWTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the FTLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFWTX and FTLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFWTXFTLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

2.67

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.65

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.96

-0.13

Drawdowns

FFWTX vs. FTLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFWTX drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, which is greater than FTLSX's maximum drawdown of -15.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFWTX and FTLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFWTXFTLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.44%

-15.74%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.68%

-3.65%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.72%

-4.83%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.44%

-15.74%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-2.81%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.82%

0.00%

Volatility

FFWTX vs. FTLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFWTX) is 1.61%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) has a volatility of 1.79%. This indicates that FFWTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFWTXFTLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

1.79%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.64%

3.80%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.38%

4.54%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.09%

5.43%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.11%

4.78%

+1.33%

FFWTX vs. FTLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFWTX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FTLSX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FFWTX vs. FTLSX - Dividend Comparison

FFWTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than FTLSX's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFWTX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.77%4.56%5.03%3.32%3.76%3.70%2.59%16.46%4.78%2.64%1.91%1.62%
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
3.53%3.68%3.37%3.19%5.28%4.91%3.06%4.44%4.26%1.97%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FFWTX and FTLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTLSX has higher volatility (1.79%) compared to FFWTX (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFWTX dropped -17.44% vs FTLSX's -15.74%.

FTLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFWTX and FTLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer