FFWTX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFWTX (Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FFWTX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Fidelity, while FSPGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FFWTX returned 3.70%/yr vs 16.03%/yr for FSPGX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFWTX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

FFWTX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFWTX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFWTX achieves a 4.64% return, which is significantly lower than FSPGX's 8.60% return.

FFWTX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 1.93%
• YTD: 4.64%
• 6M: 4.74%
• 1Y: 11.52%
• 3Y*: 8.62%
• 5Y*: 3.70%
• 10Y*: 5.53%

FSPGX

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 7.10%
• YTD: 8.60%
• 6M: 7.98%
• 1Y: 27.43%
• 3Y*: 25.53%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFWTX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFWTX Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class	4.64%	10.16%	5.83%	9.88%	-12.97%	5.15%	10.45%	14.36%	-2.58%	10.40%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	8.60%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FFWTX and FSPGX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.76

The correlation between FFWTX and FSPGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FFWTX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFWTX

FFWTX Risk / Return Rank: 78
FFWTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FFWTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FFWTX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FFWTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FFWTX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 32
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFWTX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFWTX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFWTX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.66	1.85	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.95	2.50	+1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.32	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	1.76	+1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.10	5.90	+8.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFWTX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFWTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFWTX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFWTX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.66	1.85	+0.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.75	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.90	-0.06

Drawdowns

FFWTX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFWTX drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, smaller than the maximum FSPGX drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFWTX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFWTX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.44%	-32.66%	+15.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.68%	-16.17%	+12.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.72%	-23.32%	+17.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.44%	-32.66%	+15.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.38%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.90%	-6.37%	+3.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	4.81%	-3.99%

Volatility

FFWTX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFWTX) is 1.61%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that FFWTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFWTX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.61%	3.32%	-1.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.64%	11.58%	-7.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.38%	15.39%	-11.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.09%	21.49%	-15.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.11%	21.55%	-15.44%

FFWTX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFWTX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FFWTX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

FFWTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFWTX Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class	3.77%	4.56%	5.03%	3.32%	3.76%	3.70%	2.59%	16.46%	4.78%	2.64%	1.91%	1.62%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.32%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFWTX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

FFWTX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFWTX or FSPGX?

FSPGX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to FFWTX (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFWTX dropped -17.44% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFWTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.