PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFWTX vs. FFSZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFWTX vs. FFSZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFWTX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFWTX achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly lower than FFSZX's 15.07% return.


FFWTX

1D
0.57%
1M
1.08%
YTD
4.42%
6M
4.60%
1Y
10.78%
3Y*
8.20%
5Y*
3.63%
10Y*
5.53%

FFSZX

1D
1.50%
1M
3.47%
YTD
15.07%
6M
15.85%
1Y
32.79%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFWTX vs. FFSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FFWTX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.42%10.16%5.83%9.88%-12.97%5.15%10.45%4.65%
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
15.07%24.08%14.41%20.78%-18.05%16.81%18.36%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FFWTX and FFSZX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.84

The correlation between FFWTX and FFSZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFWTX vs. FFSZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFWTX
FFWTX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FFWTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFWTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFWTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FFWTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFWTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FFSZX
FFSZX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FFSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFWTX vs. FFSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFWTX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFWTXFFSZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.44

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

3.32

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.76

14.57

-1.81

FFWTX vs. FFSZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFWTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the FFSZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFWTX and FFSZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFWTX vs. FFSZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFWTX drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, smaller than the maximum FFSZX drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFWTX and FFSZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFWTXFFSZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.44%

-31.00%

+13.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.68%

-9.77%

+6.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.72%

-15.36%

+9.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.44%

-27.17%

+9.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

0.00%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-5.78%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

2.22%

-1.37%

Volatility

FFWTX vs. FFSZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFWTX) is 2.08%, while Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that FFWTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFWTXFFSZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

5.85%

-3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.03%

11.75%

-7.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.71%

13.73%

-9.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.14%

15.19%

-9.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.13%

17.11%

-10.98%

FFWTX vs. FFSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFWTX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSZX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFWTX vs. FFSZX - Dividend Comparison

FFWTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than FFSZX's 4.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
4.98%3.82%2.92%2.26%8.99%7.98%2.41%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FFWTX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.78%4.56%5.03%3.32%3.76%3.70%2.59%16.46%4.78%2.64%1.91%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFWTX and FFSZX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFSZX has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to FFWTX (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFWTX dropped -17.44% vs FFSZX's -31.00%.

FFSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFWTX and FFSZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer