FFVFX vs. LTFIX
FFVFX (Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund) and LTFIX (Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, FFVFX returned 6.31%/yr vs 11.34%/yr for LTFIX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FFVFX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LTFIX.
Performance
FFVFX vs. LTFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFVFX achieves a 5.60% return, which is significantly lower than LTFIX's 10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FFVFX has underperformed LTFIX with an annualized return of 6.31%, while LTFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.34% annualized return.
FFVFX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 10.58%
- 3Y*
- 9.91%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- 6.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.40%
LTFIX
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 7.12%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 17.91%
- 3Y*
- 17.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FFVFX vs. LTFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFVFX Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund | 5.60% | 13.19% | 6.20% | 11.38% | -14.63% | 7.31% | 12.46% | 16.28% | -4.56% | 12.99% |
LTFIX Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund | 10.13% | 17.80% | 17.28% | 20.33% | -18.84% | 17.73% | 16.47% | 27.27% | -9.03% | 22.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFVFX and LTFIX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2008 | 0.93 |
The correlation between FFVFX and LTFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFVFX vs. LTFIX — Risk / Return Rank
FFVFX
LTFIX
FFVFX vs. LTFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund (FFVFX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFVFX | LTFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.28 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 2.26 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.84 | 9.69 | +0.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFVFX vs. LTFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFVFX drawdown since its inception was -39.04%, smaller than the maximum LTFIX drawdown of -52.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFVFX and LTFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFVFX | LTFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.04% | -52.73% | +13.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.69% | -8.71% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.69% | -15.70% | +10.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.44% | -26.80% | +6.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.44% | -33.50% | +13.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | 0.00% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -7.58% | +3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 2.03% | -0.88% |
Volatility
FFVFX vs. LTFIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund (FFVFX) is 2.11%, while Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that FFVFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFVFX | LTFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.11% | 3.56% | -1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.82% | 10.65% | -4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.69% | 12.85% | -6.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.70% | 15.60% | -7.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.62% | 15.80% | -8.18% |
FFVFX vs. LTFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFVFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than LTFIX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFVFX vs. LTFIX - Dividend Comparison
FFVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, less than LTFIX's 7.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFVFX Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund | 6.45% | 6.48% | 3.94% | 2.61% | 8.38% | 10.74% | 6.83% | 6.70% | 7.96% | 3.71% | 3.72% | 5.55% |
LTFIX Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund | 7.92% | 8.73% | 8.47% | 4.17% | 8.60% | 5.83% | 3.91% | 6.03% | 6.60% | 3.51% | 3.99% | 4.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FFVFX and LTFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LTFIX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to FFVFX (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFVFX dropped -39.04% vs LTFIX's -52.73%.
FFVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFVFX and LTFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer