FFVFX vs. FCNTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFVFX (Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both mutual funds - FFVFX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Fidelity, while FCNTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FFVFX returned 6.65%/yr vs 17.43%/yr for FCNTX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FFVFX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.

Performance

FFVFX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund (FFVFX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFVFX achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FFVFX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 6.65%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.

FFVFX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 2.23%
• YTD: 6.19%
• 6M: 6.71%
• 1Y: 14.90%
• 3Y*: 10.48%
• 5Y*: 4.40%
• 10Y*: 6.65%

FCNTX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 3.65%
• YTD: 7.76%
• 6M: 10.05%
• 1Y: 23.72%
• 3Y*: 26.93%
• 5Y*: 15.12%
• 10Y*: 17.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFVFX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFVFX Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund	6.19%	13.19%	6.20%	11.38%	-14.63%	7.31%	12.46%	16.28%	-4.56%	12.99%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	7.76%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-3.81%	32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FFVFX and FCNTX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2003	0.85

The correlation between FFVFX and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (3 years) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FFVFX vs. FCNTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFVFX	FCNTX
Technology	22.7%	27.0%
Financial Services	17.4%	13.8%
Industrials	15.7%	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.5%	9.2%
Communication Services	7.6%	21.2%
Basic Materials	5.9%	2.1%
Energy	5.7%	3.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	3.7%
Utilities	1.8%	0.5%
Real Estate	1.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

FFVFX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFVFX

FFVFX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FFVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FFVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FFVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FFVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FFVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 35
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFVFX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund (FFVFX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFVFX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	1.72	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	2.39	+1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.31	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	2.13	+1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.06	9.04	+5.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFVFX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFVFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFVFX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFVFX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	1.72	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.79	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87	0.89	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.78	-0.18

Drawdowns

FFVFX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFVFX drawdown since its inception was -39.04%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFVFX and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFVFX	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.04%	-49.19%	+10.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.69%	-11.30%	+6.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.75%	-19.75%	+13.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.44%	-32.59%	+12.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.44%	-32.59%	+12.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.53%	+0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.31%	-8.16%	+3.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.07%	2.65%	-1.58%

Volatility

FFVFX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund (FFVFX) is 2.32%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that FFVFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFVFX	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.32%	3.26%	-0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.00%	10.48%	-5.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.94%	14.03%	-8.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.58%	19.15%	-11.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.66%	19.68%	-12.02%

FFVFX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFVFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFVFX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FFVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.33%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%
FFVFX Fidelity Freedom 2015 Fund	6.42%	6.48%	3.94%	2.61%	8.38%	10.74%	6.83%	6.70%	7.96%	3.71%	3.72%	5.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFVFX and FCNTX in my portfolio?

FFVFX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFVFX or FCNTX?

FCNTX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to FFVFX (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFVFX dropped -39.04% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.