FFUT vs. SPMO
FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. FFUT is actively managed, while SPMO is passively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FFUT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
FFUT vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFUT achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return.
FFUT
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
FFUT vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF | 12.74% | 8.26% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 13.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFUT and SPMO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.05 |
FFUT vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FFUT
SPMO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
FFUT
SPMO
Financial Services
FFUT
SPMO
Communication Services
FFUT
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
FFUT
SPMO
Industrials
FFUT
SPMO
Healthcare
FFUT
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
FFUT
SPMO
Energy
FFUT
SPMO
Utilities
FFUT
SPMO
Real Estate
FFUT
SPMO
Basic Materials
FFUT
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFUT vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
FFUT
SPMO
FFUT vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFUT | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.01 | 1.01 | +0.99 |
Drawdowns
FFUT vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFUT drawdown since its inception was -2.84%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFUT and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFUT | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -30.95% | +28.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | 0.00% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.88% | -4.60% | +3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.26% | — |
Volatility
FFUT vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFUT | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.17% | 17.64% | -6.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.17% | 19.30% | -8.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.17% | 20.31% | -9.14% |
FFUT vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFUT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFUT vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
FFUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than SPMO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF | 1.85% | 2.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFUT and SPMO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.
FFUT has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.65% for SPMO.
FFUT is categorized as Systematic Trend, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFUT and 0.13% for SPMO.
Find the right allocation for FFUT and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer