FFUT vs. QMHIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) and QMHIX (AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund) are both Systematic Trend funds. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FFUT charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.65%/yr for QMHIX.

Performance

FFUT vs. QMHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFUT achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly lower than QMHIX's 17.77% return.

FFUT

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 6M: 14.35%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMHIX

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 17.77%
• 6M: 21.56%
• 1Y: 33.93%
• 3Y*: 16.36%
• 5Y*: 16.27%
• 10Y*: 5.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFUT vs. QMHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	12.74%	8.26%
QMHIX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund	17.77%	13.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FFUT and QMHIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

FFUT vs. QMHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMHIX

QMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 82
QMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
QMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
QMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFUT vs. QMHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFUT	QMHIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.01	0.38	+1.62

Drawdowns

FFUT vs. QMHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFUT drawdown since its inception was -2.84%, smaller than the maximum QMHIX drawdown of -39.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFUT and QMHIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFUT	QMHIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.84%	-39.37%	+36.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.83%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-1.02%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-17.82%	+16.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FFUT	QMHIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.69%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.17%	12.74%	-1.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.17%	17.35%	-6.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.17%	15.51%	-4.34%

FFUT vs. QMHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFUT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than QMHIX's 1.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFUT vs. QMHIX - Dividend Comparison

FFUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than QMHIX's 1.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	1.85%	2.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QMHIX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund	1.74%	2.05%	2.31%	7.66%	9.34%	10.96%	9.52%	4.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	7.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFUT and QMHIX in my portfolio?

FFUT and QMHIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.