FFUT vs. LDRT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) and LDRT (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity, while LDRT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the BlackRock iBonds® 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder Index. FFUT is actively managed, while LDRT is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. FFUT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for LDRT.

Performance

FFUT vs. LDRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFUT achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than LDRT's 0.72% return.

FFUT

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 6M: 14.35%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LDRT

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 0.72%
• 6M: 0.95%
• 1Y: 3.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFUT vs. LDRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	12.74%	8.26%
LDRT iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF	0.72%	2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FFUT and LDRT is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025	-0.37

Return for Risk

FFUT vs. LDRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDRT

LDRT Risk / Return Rank: 50
LDRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
LDRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
LDRT Omega Ratio Rank: 45
LDRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
LDRT Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFUT vs. LDRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFUT	LDRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.01	1.55	+0.45

Drawdowns

FFUT vs. LDRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFUT drawdown since its inception was -2.84%, which is greater than LDRT's maximum drawdown of -1.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFUT and LDRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFUT	LDRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.84%	-1.11%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-0.52%	-0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-0.32%	-0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.42%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FFUT	LDRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.88%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.65%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.17%	2.80%	+8.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.17%	2.79%	+8.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.17%	2.79%	+8.38%

FFUT vs. LDRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFUT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRT's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFUT vs. LDRT - Dividend Comparison

FFUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than LDRT's 4.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	1.85%	2.09%	0.00%
LDRT iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF	4.09%	3.86%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFUT and LDRT in my portfolio?

FFUT and LDRT have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FFUT or LDRT?

On fees, LDRT is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFUT or LDRT?

LDRT is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFUT or LDRT?

LDRT has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 1.85% for FFUT.

What is the main difference between FFUT and LDRT?

FFUT is categorized as Systematic Trend, while LDRT is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFUT and 0.07% for LDRT.