FFUT vs. KMLM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) and KMLM (KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity, while KMLM is a Long-Short fund actively managed by CICC. Both are actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FFUT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for KMLM.

Performance

FFUT vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFUT achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than KMLM's 10.79% return.

FFUT

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 6M: 14.35%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KMLM

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -2.41%
• YTD: 10.79%
• 6M: 13.19%
• 1Y: 13.68%
• 3Y*: -0.47%
• 5Y*: 4.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFUT vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	12.74%	8.26%
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF	10.79%	2.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FFUT and KMLM is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

FFUT vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMLM

KMLM Risk / Return Rank: 36
KMLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
KMLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
KMLM Omega Ratio Rank: 32
KMLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
KMLM Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFUT vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFUT	KMLM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.01	0.49	+1.51

Drawdowns

FFUT vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFUT drawdown since its inception was -2.84%, smaller than the maximum KMLM drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFUT and KMLM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFUT	KMLM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.84%	-27.47%	+24.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.30%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.28%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-13.61%	+12.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-12.74%	+11.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.91%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FFUT	KMLM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.63%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.17%	11.43%	-0.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.17%	14.62%	-3.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.17%	14.73%	-3.56%

FFUT vs. KMLM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFUT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFUT vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison

FFUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than KMLM's 4.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	1.85%	2.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF	4.53%	5.02%	0.82%	0.00%	13.22%	6.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFUT and KMLM in my portfolio?

FFUT and KMLM have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FFUT or KMLM?

On fees, FFUT is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFUT or KMLM?

FFUT is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for KMLM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFUT or KMLM?

KMLM has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 1.85% for FFUT.

What is the main difference between FFUT and KMLM?

FFUT is categorized as Systematic Trend, while KMLM is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFUT and 0.90% for KMLM.