PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFUT vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFUT vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFUT achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 23.56% return.


FFUT

1D
-0.36%
1M
-2.69%
YTD
8.83%
6M
9.28%
1Y
18.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTEC

1D
-3.70%
1M
0.35%
YTD
23.56%
6M
21.69%
1Y
47.58%
3Y*
30.58%
5Y*
19.77%
10Y*
25.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFUT vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FFUT and FTEC is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFUT vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFUT
FFUT Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFUT vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFUTFTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.35

2.94

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.55

9.03

+5.53

FFUT vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFUT Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFUT and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFUT vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFUT drawdown since its inception was -4.33%, smaller than the maximum FTEC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFUT and FTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFUTFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-34.95%

+30.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.33%

-16.26%

+11.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.33%

-7.72%

+3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-5.57%

+4.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

5.28%

-3.99%

Volatility

FFUT vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) is 2.93%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 11.42%. This indicates that FFUT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFUTFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

11.42%

-8.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

18.65%

-9.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.22%

22.79%

-11.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.02%

25.60%

-14.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.02%

24.86%

-13.84%

FFUT vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFUT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFUT vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

FFUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than FTEC's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFUT
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF
1.92%2.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.36%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFUT and FTEC have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTEC has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to FFUT (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFUT dropped -4.33% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

On 1-year performance, FTEC leads with 47.58% vs 18.72% for FFUT. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FFUT has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 47.58% return vs 18.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.

FFUT has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 0.36% for FTEC.

FFUT is categorized as Systematic Trend, while FTEC is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFUT and 0.08% for FTEC.

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFUT and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer