PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFUT vs. FMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFUT vs. FMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund (FMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFUT achieves a 12.52% return, which is significantly higher than FMF's 6.61% return.


FFUT

1D
-0.94%
1M
4.47%
6M
9.16%
YTD
12.52%
1Y
22.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.82%

FMF

1D
-0.90%
1M
0.55%
6M
3.51%
YTD
6.61%
1Y
14.03%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
2.54%
ALL TIME*
1.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.87M$4.04M$2.05M
$1.94M$1.52M$2.68M

FFUT vs. FMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FFUT and FMF is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFUT vs. FMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFUT
FFUT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FMF
FMF Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMF Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMF Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFUT vs. FMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund (FMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFUTFMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.27

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

3.13

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.81

8.41

+5.41

FFUT vs. FMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFUT Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the FMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFUT and FMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFUT vs. FMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFUT drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, smaller than the maximum FMF drawdown of -22.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFUT and FMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFUTFMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-22.21%

+16.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.59%

-4.51%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.36%

-3.99%

+1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-9.77%

+8.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.67%

-0.03%

Volatility

FFUT vs. FMF - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund (FMF) at 2.92%. This indicates that FFUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFUTFMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

2.92%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

7.50%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.66%

9.58%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.11%

10.74%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.11%

11.55%

-0.44%

FFUT vs. FMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFUT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than FMF's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFUT vs. FMF - Dividend Comparison

FFUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than FMF's 5.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFUT
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF
1.86%2.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FMF
First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund
5.07%5.60%4.85%3.09%0.41%3.29%0.02%1.05%1.56%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFUT and FMF have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFUT has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to FMF (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFUT dropped -5.59% vs FMF's -22.21%.

On 1-year performance, FFUT leads with 22.59% vs 14.03% for FMF. On fees, FFUT is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, FMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FFUT has performed better with a 22.59% return vs 14.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FFUT is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FMF.

FMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.07%, compared with 1.86% for FFUT.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFUT and 0.95% for FMF.

FFUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFUT and FMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer