FFUT vs. FBND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. FFUT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.

Performance

FFUT vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFUT achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.50% return.

FFUT

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 6M: 14.35%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBND

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: 0.30%
• 1Y: 5.59%
• 3Y*: 4.70%
• 5Y*: 0.83%
• 10Y*: 2.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFUT vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	12.74%	8.26%
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	0.50%	4.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FFUT and FBND is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025	-0.33

FFUT vs. FBND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFUT	FBND
Technology	65.3%	-
Financial Services	7.4%	0.2%
Communication Services	5.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	-
Industrials	4.5%	71.4%
Healthcare	4.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	-
Energy	2.0%	1.1%
Utilities	1.7%	27.5%
Real Estate	0.9%	-
Basic Materials	0.9%	-

Return for Risk

FFUT vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBND

FBND Risk / Return Rank: 40
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFUT vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFUT	FBND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.01	0.44	+1.56

Drawdowns

FFUT vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFUT drawdown since its inception was -2.84%, smaller than the maximum FBND drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFUT and FBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFUT	FBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.84%	-17.25%	+14.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.66%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.94%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-1.43%	+0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-3.35%	+2.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.88%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FFUT	FBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.73%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.17%	3.86%	+7.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.17%	5.92%	+5.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.17%	6.10%	+5.07%

FFUT vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFUT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFUT vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

FFUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than FBND's 4.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	4.70%	4.70%	4.73%	4.26%	3.07%	1.86%	4.25%	2.90%	2.93%	2.56%	2.84%	3.26%
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	1.85%	2.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFUT and FBND in my portfolio?

FFUT and FBND have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FFUT or FBND?

On fees, FBND is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFUT or FBND?

FBND is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFUT or FBND?

FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 1.85% for FFUT.

What is the main difference between FFUT and FBND?

FFUT is categorized as Systematic Trend, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFUT and 0.36% for FBND.