PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFTY vs. AUXFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFTY vs. AUXFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and Auxier Focus Fund (AUXFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFTY achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly lower than AUXFX's 11.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FFTY has underperformed AUXFX with an annualized return of 5.57%, while AUXFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.25% annualized return.


FFTY

1D
-0.91%
1M
-9.03%
6M
3.47%
YTD
6.26%
1Y
13.28%
3Y*
13.48%
5Y*
-2.78%
10Y*
5.57%
ALL TIME*
4.04%

AUXFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.14%
6M
9.31%
YTD
11.54%
1Y
21.19%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
9.40%
10Y*
10.25%
ALL TIME*
7.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$863.41K$1.19M$1.59M

FFTY vs. AUXFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFTY
CapForce IBD 50 ETF
6.26%23.38%18.36%12.40%-51.08%11.92%18.20%25.74%-16.76%37.62%
AUXFX
Auxier Focus Fund
11.54%15.23%11.31%9.76%-4.52%20.03%6.04%20.20%-4.13%17.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FFTY and AUXFX is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2015

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between FFTY and AUXFX has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFTY vs. AUXFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFTY
FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

AUXFX
AUXFX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AUXFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUXFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUXFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AUXFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUXFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFTY vs. AUXFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and Auxier Focus Fund (AUXFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFTYAUXFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.41

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

3.65

-3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.00

12.93

-11.92

FFTY vs. AUXFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the AUXFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFTY and AUXFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFTY vs. AUXFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFTY drawdown since its inception was -59.46%, which is greater than AUXFX's maximum drawdown of -39.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTY and AUXFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFTYAUXFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.46%

-39.82%

-19.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.29%

-5.42%

-17.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.60%

-9.30%

-20.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.46%

-15.73%

-43.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.46%

-33.69%

-25.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.10%

-0.50%

-24.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.32%

-4.40%

-17.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.51%

1.53%

+7.98%

Volatility

FFTY vs. AUXFX - Volatility Comparison

CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to Auxier Focus Fund (AUXFX) at 2.69%. This indicates that FFTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUXFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFTYAUXFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.45%

2.69%

+5.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.16%

6.68%

+22.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.53%

8.86%

+27.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.75%

12.15%

+17.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.79%

15.14%

+12.65%

FFTY vs. AUXFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFTY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than AUXFX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFTY vs. AUXFX - Dividend Comparison

FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than AUXFX's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUXFX
Auxier Focus Fund
2.54%2.84%3.41%4.38%3.02%2.49%2.36%6.03%6.82%5.52%2.77%5.76%
FFTY
CapForce IBD 50 ETF
1.27%1.35%0.91%0.65%2.75%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFTY and AUXFX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFTY has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to AUXFX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFTY dropped -59.46% vs AUXFX's -39.82%.

AUXFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFTY and AUXFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer