PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFTMX vs. FIQDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFTMX vs. FIQDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class M (FFTMX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFTMX achieves a 8.85% return, which is significantly higher than FIQDX's 6.68% return.


FFTMX

1D
0.94%
1M
1.77%
YTD
8.85%
6M
8.92%
1Y
19.54%
3Y*
11.99%
5Y*
5.90%
10Y*
7.46%

FIQDX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
6.68%
6M
6.80%
1Y
12.67%
3Y*
8.90%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFTMX vs. FIQDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FFTMX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class M
8.85%14.31%7.95%12.50%-15.42%9.24%14.11%17.56%-7.69%
FIQDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z
6.68%10.40%6.03%4.55%-3.17%15.96%3.79%10.63%-4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FFTMX and FIQDX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2018

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between FFTMX and FIQDX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFTMX vs. FIQDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFTMX
FFTMX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FFTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQDX
FIQDX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FIQDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFTMX vs. FIQDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class M (FFTMX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFTMXFIQDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.50

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

4.67

-1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.34

19.25

-5.90

FFTMX vs. FIQDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFTMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the FIQDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFTMX and FIQDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFTMX vs. FIQDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFTMX drawdown since its inception was -38.42%, which is greater than FIQDX's maximum drawdown of -19.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTMX and FIQDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFTMXFIQDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.42%

-19.98%

-18.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-2.69%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.40%

-5.91%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.94%

-12.79%

-8.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.69%

+2.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.64%

-2.97%

-1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

0.66%

+0.79%

Volatility

FFTMX vs. FIQDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class M (FFTMX) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX) at 1.40%. This indicates that FFTMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIQDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFTMXFIQDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

1.40%

+2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.18%

3.73%

+3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.46%

4.81%

+3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.40%

6.91%

+2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.34%

7.40%

+1.94%

FFTMX vs. FIQDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFTMX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQDX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFTMX vs. FIQDX - Dividend Comparison

FFTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, more than FIQDX's 4.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFTMX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class M
6.47%7.09%3.37%1.67%6.24%2.41%1.92%3.70%4.68%3.50%1.28%5.17%
FIQDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z
4.27%4.75%4.88%5.38%7.39%5.44%2.29%3.17%8.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFTMX and FIQDX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFTMX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to FIQDX (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFTMX dropped -38.42% vs FIQDX's -19.98%.

FIQDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFTMX and FIQDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer