PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFTMX vs. ASFYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFTMX vs. ASFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class M (FFTMX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFTMX achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly lower than ASFYX's 9.30% return. Over the past 10 years, FFTMX has outperformed ASFYX with an annualized return of 7.38%, while ASFYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.14% annualized return.


FFTMX

1D
0.34%
1M
0.43%
6M
8.81%
YTD
8.81%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
12.06%
5Y*
5.58%
10Y*
7.38%

ASFYX

1D
0.59%
1M
-4.62%
6M
9.30%
YTD
9.30%
1Y
19.13%
3Y*
-3.62%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*
2.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFTMX vs. ASFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFTMX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class M
8.81%14.31%7.95%12.50%-15.42%9.24%14.11%17.56%-5.87%13.10%
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
9.30%-9.67%-3.22%-10.33%35.67%3.52%13.59%8.99%-12.59%6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FFTMX and ASFYX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2010

0.22

Over the past year, FFTMX and ASFYX have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFTMX vs. ASFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFTMX
FFTMX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FFTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ASFYX
ASFYX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
ASFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
ASFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFTMX vs. ASFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class M (FFTMX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFTMXASFYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.28

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.61

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.36

9.60

+1.76

FFTMX vs. ASFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFTMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the ASFYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFTMX and ASFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFTMX vs. ASFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFTMX drawdown since its inception was -38.42%, which is greater than ASFYX's maximum drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTMX and ASFYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFTMXASFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.42%

-36.43%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-7.42%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.40%

-30.32%

+20.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.94%

-36.43%

+15.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.33%

-36.43%

+15.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-22.44%

+22.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-13.21%

+8.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

2.02%

-0.56%

Volatility

FFTMX vs. ASFYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class M (FFTMX) is 3.69%, while AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that FFTMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFTMXASFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

4.48%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

10.18%

-2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.52%

12.36%

-3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.43%

13.82%

-4.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.31%

12.74%

-3.43%

FFTMX vs. ASFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFTMX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than ASFYX's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFTMX vs. ASFYX - Dividend Comparison

FFTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, more than ASFYX's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
1.39%1.52%1.46%0.99%32.48%6.07%3.40%5.51%1.30%0.07%0.01%5.06%
FFTMX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class M
6.47%7.09%3.37%1.67%6.24%2.41%1.92%3.70%4.68%3.50%1.28%5.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFTMX and ASFYX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASFYX has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to FFTMX (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFTMX dropped -38.42% vs ASFYX's -36.43%.

FFTMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFTMX and ASFYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer