PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFSIX vs. GFSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFSIX vs. GFSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I (FFSIX) and Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund (GFSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFSIX achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly lower than GFSIX's 13.30% return.


FFSIX

1D
0.16%
1M
3.16%
6M
8.61%
YTD
9.99%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
25.04%
5Y*
14.51%
10Y*
14.87%
ALL TIME*
8.60%

GFSIX

1D
0.21%
1M
4.95%
6M
10.07%
YTD
13.30%
1Y
31.99%
3Y*
28.43%
5Y*
18.67%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FFSIX vs. GFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FFSIX
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I
9.99%15.23%39.62%14.33%-8.71%33.30%0.06%34.10%-14.08%
GFSIX
Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund
13.30%36.58%28.17%25.77%-11.12%29.11%-1.28%9.12%0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FFSIX and GFSIX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018

0.85

The correlation between FFSIX and GFSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFSIX vs. GFSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFSIX
FFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

GFSIX
GFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFSIX vs. GFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I (FFSIX) and Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund (GFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFSIXGFSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.43

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

3.25

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.85

10.60

-6.74

FFSIX vs. GFSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the GFSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFSIX and GFSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFSIX vs. GFSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFSIX drawdown since its inception was -75.57%, which is greater than GFSIX's maximum drawdown of -46.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSIX and GFSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFSIXGFSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.57%

-46.39%

-29.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.99%

-9.42%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.38%

-14.49%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.92%

-28.07%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

0.00%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.09%

-7.45%

-9.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.51%

2.88%

+1.63%

Volatility

FFSIX vs. GFSIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I (FFSIX) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund (GFSIX) at 3.28%. This indicates that FFSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFSIXGFSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

3.28%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.21%

9.56%

+2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.18%

12.54%

+3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.91%

17.21%

+3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.84%

21.61%

+2.23%

FFSIX vs. GFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFSIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than GFSIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFSIX vs. GFSIX - Dividend Comparison

FFSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, more than GFSIX's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFSIX
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I
6.31%6.94%9.90%2.45%6.01%4.31%2.61%1.43%4.23%0.06%0.32%0.63%
GFSIX
Gabelli Global Financial Services Fund
1.63%1.85%2.44%2.68%2.96%2.11%1.58%2.69%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFSIX and GFSIX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFSIX has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to GFSIX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFSIX dropped -75.57% vs GFSIX's -46.39%.

GFSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFSIX and GFSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer