PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFRSX vs. EIFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFRSX vs. EIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund (FFRSX) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFRSX achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly higher than EIFAX's 0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FFRSX has underperformed EIFAX with an annualized return of 3.28%, while EIFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.88% annualized return.


FFRSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.12%
6M
1.25%
YTD
1.23%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
5.74%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*
3.28%
ALL TIME*
3.42%

EIFAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.83%
YTD
0.51%
1Y
2.27%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
4.82%
10Y*
4.88%
ALL TIME*
5.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FFRSX vs. EIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFRSX
Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund
1.23%5.61%6.71%8.04%-5.85%3.73%0.45%6.71%0.38%3.54%
EIFAX
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
0.51%4.54%8.91%11.86%-2.98%5.41%1.90%9.02%0.28%5.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FFRSX and EIFAX is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2010

0.60

The correlation between FFRSX and EIFAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.60 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFRSX vs. EIFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFRSX
FFRSX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FFRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FFRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

EIFAX
EIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
EIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFRSX vs. EIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund (FFRSX) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFRSXEIFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.26

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

1.00

+2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.02

2.99

+9.03

FFRSX vs. EIFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFRSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the EIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFRSX and EIFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFRSX vs. EIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFRSX drawdown since its inception was -17.13%, smaller than the maximum EIFAX drawdown of -40.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFRSX and EIFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFRSXEIFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.13%

-40.28%

+23.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.07%

-2.29%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.45%

-3.43%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.54%

-7.63%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.13%

-24.22%

+7.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.21%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.90%

-2.25%

+1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.31%

0.76%

-0.45%

Volatility

FFRSX vs. EIFAX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund (FFRSX) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) have volatilities of 0.21% and 0.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFRSXEIFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.21%

0.22%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.35%

1.87%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00%

2.46%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.44%

3.15%

-0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.24%

4.45%

-1.21%

FFRSX vs. EIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFRSX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than EIFAX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFRSX vs. EIFAX - Dividend Comparison

FFRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, less than EIFAX's 6.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIFAX
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
6.86%8.09%8.91%7.02%5.92%4.03%4.51%5.58%5.10%4.46%5.02%5.29%
FFRSX
Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund
5.22%6.38%6.95%6.88%4.15%2.92%3.37%4.62%4.41%3.68%3.76%3.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFRSX and EIFAX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIFAX has higher volatility (0.22%) compared to FFRSX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFRSX dropped -17.13% vs EIFAX's -40.28%.

FFRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFRSX and EIFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer