PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFRHX vs. GBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFRHX vs. GBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFRHX achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly higher than GBTC's -27.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FFRHX has underperformed GBTC with an annualized return of 4.90%, while GBTC has yielded a comparatively higher 46.47% annualized return.


FFRHX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.98%
1Y
5.78%
3Y*
7.24%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
4.90%

GBTC

1D
0.04%
1M
-20.21%
YTD
-27.82%
6M
-30.09%
1Y
-41.39%
3Y*
55.55%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
46.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFRHX vs. GBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
1.60%5.47%7.10%12.63%-1.55%5.01%1.69%8.63%0.10%3.91%
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
-27.82%-7.65%113.81%317.61%-75.80%7.03%290.72%106.56%-82.10%1,787.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FFRHX and GBTC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2015

0.10

The correlation between FFRHX and GBTC shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFRHX vs. GBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFRHX
FFRHX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FFRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FFRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

GBTC
GBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
GBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
GBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFRHX vs. GBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFRHXGBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+7.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.86

0.85

+1.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.87

-0.79

+5.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.02

-1.39

+18.40

FFRHX vs. GBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFRHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the GBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFRHX and GBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFRHX vs. GBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFRHX drawdown since its inception was -22.20%, smaller than the maximum GBTC drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFRHX and GBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFRHXGBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.20%

-89.91%

+67.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.19%

-52.45%

+51.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.29%

-52.45%

+49.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.90%

-85.42%

+79.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.20%

-89.91%

+67.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-49.87%

+49.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.15%

-43.43%

+42.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

29.85%

-29.51%

Volatility

FFRHX vs. GBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) is 0.64%, while Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) has a volatility of 11.97%. This indicates that FFRHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFRHXGBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

11.97%

-11.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.63%

34.41%

-32.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37%

44.01%

-41.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.88%

62.25%

-59.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.14%

81.84%

-77.70%

FFRHX vs. GBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFRHX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than GBTC's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFRHX vs. GBTC - Dividend Comparison

FFRHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%, while GBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.10%7.41%6.94%8.24%3.81%2.74%3.84%5.15%4.74%4.05%4.44%3.69%
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.61%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFRHX and GBTC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GBTC has higher volatility (11.97%) compared to FFRHX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFRHX dropped -22.20% vs GBTC's -89.91%.

FFRHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFRHX and GBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer