PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFRCX vs. FSHNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFRCX vs. FSHNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C (FFRCX) and Fidelity Series High Income Fund (FSHNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFRCX achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than FSHNX's 3.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FFRCX has underperformed FSHNX with an annualized return of 3.85%, while FSHNX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.20% annualized return.


FFRCX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.69%
YTD
1.61%
6M
2.04%
1Y
5.03%
3Y*
6.35%
5Y*
4.34%
10Y*
3.85%

FSHNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.99%
YTD
3.33%
6M
4.07%
1Y
10.75%
3Y*
10.22%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
6.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFRCX vs. FSHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFRCX
Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C
1.61%4.38%6.18%10.70%-2.34%4.08%0.61%7.49%-0.95%2.85%
FSHNX
Fidelity Series High Income Fund
3.33%11.17%8.75%11.25%-11.52%6.05%4.57%15.20%-2.14%9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FFRCX and FSHNX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2011

0.59

The correlation between FFRCX and FSHNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFRCX vs. FSHNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFRCX
FFRCX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FFRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FFRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FSHNX
FSHNX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FSHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FSHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFRCX vs. FSHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C (FFRCX) and Fidelity Series High Income Fund (FSHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFRCXFSHNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.35

3.44

-1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.03

6.69

-1.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

1.91

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

5.75

-1.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.18

30.13

-16.96

FFRCX vs. FSHNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFRCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is lower than the FSHNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFRCX and FSHNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFRCXFSHNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

3.44

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.61

0.98

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

1.07

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

1.00

-0.01

Drawdowns

FFRCX vs. FSHNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFRCX drawdown since its inception was -22.31%, roughly equal to the maximum FSHNX drawdown of -21.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFRCX and FSHNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFRCXFSHNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.31%

-21.98%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.33%

-2.13%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.37%

-4.05%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.30%

-15.32%

+9.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.31%

-21.98%

-0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

0.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-2.42%

+1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

0.40%

-0.02%

Volatility

FFRCX vs. FSHNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C (FFRCX) is 0.53%, while Fidelity Series High Income Fund (FSHNX) has a volatility of 0.97%. This indicates that FFRCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFRCXFSHNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

0.97%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.52%

2.55%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15%

3.55%

-1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.70%

5.31%

-2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.02%

5.83%

-1.81%

FFRCX vs. FSHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFRCX has a 1.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FSHNX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFRCX vs. FSHNX - Dividend Comparison

FFRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, less than FSHNX's 6.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFRCX
Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C
6.03%6.37%6.09%6.56%2.98%1.86%2.83%4.11%3.64%3.02%3.35%2.70%
FSHNX
Fidelity Series High Income Fund
6.96%7.04%5.97%6.21%4.90%5.01%5.57%6.35%6.95%6.03%6.24%5.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFRCX and FSHNX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSHNX has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to FFRCX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFRCX dropped -22.31% vs FSHNX's -21.98%.

FSHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFRCX and FSHNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer