PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFOPX vs. FRQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFOPX vs. FRQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFOPX achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly higher than FRQAX's 3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FFOPX has outperformed FRQAX with an annualized return of 12.24%, while FRQAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.86% annualized return.


FFOPX

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.74%
YTD
11.72%
6M
11.09%
1Y
26.60%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
12.24%

FRQAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.65%
YTD
3.51%
6M
3.48%
1Y
8.84%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
2.49%
10Y*
4.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFOPX vs. FRQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFOPX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class
11.72%21.41%14.20%19.97%-18.20%15.98%16.55%26.00%-7.19%20.61%
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
3.51%9.54%4.21%8.24%-12.60%3.56%9.32%12.33%-3.06%10.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FFOPX and FRQAX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2015

0.85

The correlation between FFOPX and FRQAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFOPX vs. FRQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFOPX
FFOPX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FFOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FFOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQAX
FRQAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FRQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFOPX vs. FRQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFOPXFRQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

2.66

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.31

11.08

+2.23

FFOPX vs. FRQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFOPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the FRQAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFOPX and FRQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFOPX vs. FRQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFOPX drawdown since its inception was -30.71%, smaller than the maximum FRQAX drawdown of -38.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOPX and FRQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFOPXFRQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.71%

-38.22%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-3.46%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.72%

-5.27%

-9.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-17.24%

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.71%

-17.24%

-13.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.43%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-4.56%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

0.83%

+1.25%

Volatility

FFOPX vs. FRQAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) at 1.67%. This indicates that FFOPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFOPXFRQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

1.67%

+3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

3.68%

+6.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.34%

4.36%

+7.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

5.59%

+8.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.21%

5.34%

+9.87%

FFOPX vs. FRQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFOPX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQAX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFOPX vs. FRQAX - Dividend Comparison

FFOPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than FRQAX's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFOPX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class
1.79%2.01%2.04%1.98%2.07%2.05%1.97%15.21%2.32%2.09%2.14%2.01%
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
2.99%2.72%2.71%2.46%4.74%5.76%3.26%2.93%5.33%16.05%2.18%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFOPX and FRQAX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFOPX has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to FRQAX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFOPX dropped -30.71% vs FRQAX's -38.22%.

FFOPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFOPX and FRQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer