FFOPX vs. FBGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX).
FFOPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2009. FBGRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1987.
Performance
FFOPX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFOPX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFOPX Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class | -1.52% | 21.41% | 14.20% | 19.97% | -18.20% | 15.98% | 16.55% | 26.00% | -7.19% | 20.61% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | -7.12% | 19.91% | 39.77% | 55.61% | -38.45% | 22.64% | 62.20% | 33.43% | 1.02% | 36.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFOPX achieves a -1.52% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's -7.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FFOPX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 10.73%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.08% annualized return.
FFOPX
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- -1.52%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 19.25%
- 3Y*
- 15.27%
- 5Y*
- 8.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
FBGRX
- 1D
- 4.54%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -7.12%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- 26.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- 19.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFOPX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFOPX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFOPX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank
FFOPX
FBGRX
FFOPX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFOPX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 1.13 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 1.73 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.25 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 2.00 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.34 | 7.92 | +0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFOPX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 1.13 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.47 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.81 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.65 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFOPX and FBGRX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FFOPX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
FFOPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, which matches FBGRX's 2.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFOPX Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class | 2.04% | 2.01% | 2.04% | 1.98% | 2.07% | 2.05% | 1.97% | 15.21% | 2.32% | 2.09% | 2.14% | 2.01% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 2.05% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
Drawdowns
FFOPX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFOPX drawdown since its inception was -30.71%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOPX and FBGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFOPX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.71% | -58.64% | +27.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.81% | -13.89% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.18% | -43.08% | +16.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.71% | -43.08% | +12.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.51% | -8.68% | +2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -12.58% | +7.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 3.51% | -1.14% |
Volatility
FFOPX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) is 5.84%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 7.83%. This indicates that FFOPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFOPX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 7.83% | -1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | 14.08% | -4.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.37% | 24.98% | -9.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 24.93% | -10.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.11% | 23.63% | -8.52% |