PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFOPX vs. DRIJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFOPX vs. DRIJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) and Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FFOPX having a 10.27% return and DRIJX slightly lower at 10.23%. Over the past 10 years, FFOPX has underperformed DRIJX with an annualized return of 11.40%, while DRIJX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.13% annualized return.


FFOPX

1D
1.95%
1M
-0.50%
6M
7.18%
YTD
10.27%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
11.40%
ALL TIME*
10.48%

DRIJX

1D
1.59%
1M
-0.12%
6M
7.23%
YTD
10.23%
1Y
21.33%
3Y*
17.05%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
12.13%
ALL TIME*
12.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FFOPX vs. DRIJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFOPX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class
10.27%21.41%14.20%19.97%-18.20%15.98%16.55%26.00%-7.19%20.61%
DRIJX
Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
10.23%19.64%17.05%21.37%-15.25%21.63%14.09%25.59%-9.14%21.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FFOPX and DRIJX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.98

The correlation between FFOPX and DRIJX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFOPX vs. DRIJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFOPX
FFOPX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FFOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FFOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIJX
DRIJX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DRIJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIJX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIJX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFOPX vs. DRIJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) and Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFOPXDRIJXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.42

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.32

10.40

-1.08

FFOPX vs. DRIJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFOPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the DRIJX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFOPX and DRIJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFOPX vs. DRIJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFOPX drawdown since its inception was -30.71%, smaller than the maximum DRIJX drawdown of -33.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOPX and DRIJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFOPXDRIJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.71%

-33.55%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-8.12%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.72%

-15.25%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-23.49%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.71%

-33.55%

+2.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-1.31%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-4.15%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

1.89%

+0.27%

Volatility

FFOPX vs. DRIJX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIJX) at 3.16%. This indicates that FFOPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFOPXDRIJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

3.16%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

9.32%

+1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

11.22%

+1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

14.65%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

15.56%

-0.40%

FFOPX vs. DRIJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFOPX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIJX's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FFOPX vs. DRIJX - Dividend Comparison

FFOPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than DRIJX's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRIJX
Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
2.36%2.49%2.53%3.40%3.98%2.87%4.15%2.18%2.29%1.25%1.40%0.00%
FFOPX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class
1.81%2.01%2.04%1.98%2.07%2.05%1.97%15.21%2.32%2.09%2.14%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FFOPX and DRIJX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFOPX has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to DRIJX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFOPX dropped -30.71% vs DRIJX's -33.55%.

DRIJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFOPX and DRIJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer