PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFLEX vs. LTFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFLEX vs. LTFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2060 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFLEX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLEX achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly higher than LTFIX's 9.67% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FFLEX having a 11.98% annualized return and LTFIX not far behind at 11.59%.


FFLEX

1D
0.41%
1M
5.63%
YTD
12.63%
6M
13.55%
1Y
28.80%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
10.15%
10Y*
11.98%

LTFIX

1D
0.42%
1M
4.75%
YTD
9.67%
6M
10.05%
1Y
22.88%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
11.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLEX vs. LTFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFLEX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2060 Fund Institutional Premium Class
12.63%21.47%14.20%19.97%-18.19%15.98%16.46%26.17%-7.21%20.63%
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
9.67%17.80%17.28%20.33%-18.84%17.73%16.47%27.27%-9.03%22.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLEX and LTFIX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.98

The correlation between FFLEX and LTFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFLEX vs. LTFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLEX
FFLEX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FFLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

LTFIX
LTFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LTFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LTFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLEX vs. LTFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2060 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFLEX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFLEXLTFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.36

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

2.68

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.22

12.06

+2.16

FFLEX vs. LTFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the LTFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLEX and LTFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFLEXLTFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

1.97

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.61

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.73

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.47

+0.26

Drawdowns

FFLEX vs. LTFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLEX drawdown since its inception was -30.71%, smaller than the maximum LTFIX drawdown of -52.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLEX and LTFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFLEXLTFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.71%

-52.73%

+22.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.07%

-8.71%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.68%

-15.70%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.17%

-26.80%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.71%

-33.50%

+2.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.67%

-7.64%

+2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.93%

+0.11%

Volatility

FFLEX vs. LTFIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2060 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFLEX) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) at 3.34%. This indicates that FFLEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFLEXLTFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

3.34%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

9.46%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.64%

11.84%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.39%

15.46%

-1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

15.84%

-0.68%

FFLEX vs. LTFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLEX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than LTFIX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FFLEX vs. LTFIX - Dividend Comparison

FFLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than LTFIX's 7.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFLEX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2060 Fund Institutional Premium Class
1.71%1.98%1.98%1.94%2.03%1.95%1.85%6.75%2.36%2.16%2.44%1.82%
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
7.96%8.73%8.47%4.17%8.60%5.83%3.91%6.03%6.60%3.51%3.99%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FFLEX and LTFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFLEX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to LTFIX (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLEX dropped -30.71% vs LTFIX's -52.73%.

FFLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFLEX and LTFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer