FFIU vs. FAAR
FFIU (UVA Unconstrained Medium-Term Fixed Income ETF) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFIU is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Mcivy Co. LLC, while FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FFIU returned -0.16%/yr vs 7.89%/yr for FAAR. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. FFIU charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.
Performance
FFIU vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFIU achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 20.23% return.
FFIU
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- 4.04%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- —
FAAR
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- 20.23%
- 6M
- 19.92%
- 1Y
- 26.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
FFIU vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFIU UVA Unconstrained Medium-Term Fixed Income ETF | -0.37% | 8.55% | 0.21% | 7.42% | -15.18% | 0.10% | 7.91% | 9.62% | -0.68% | -0.31% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 20.23% | 8.07% | 5.97% | -5.63% | 10.15% | 12.34% | 8.60% | -1.28% | -9.17% | 3.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFIU and FAAR is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2017 | -0.05 |
The correlation between FFIU and FAAR shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFIU vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank
FFIU
FAAR
FFIU vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UVA Unconstrained Medium-Term Fixed Income ETF (FFIU) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFIU | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.35 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 4.75 | -3.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.06 | 14.70 | -12.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFIU vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFIU drawdown since its inception was -20.43%, which is greater than FAAR's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFIU and FAAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFIU | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.43% | -18.03% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.79% | -5.68% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.26% | -11.54% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.43% | -18.03% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -5.43% | +2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.41% | -7.82% | +2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 1.89% | +0.37% |
Volatility
FFIU vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UVA Unconstrained Medium-Term Fixed Income ETF (FFIU) is 1.46%, while First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that FFIU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFIU | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 2.47% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.75% | 9.68% | -4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.20% | 13.37% | -5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.14% | 12.95% | -4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.20% | 11.53% | -4.33% |
FFIU vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFIU has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFIU vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison
FFIU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, less than FAAR's 9.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 9.57% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% |
FFIU UVA Unconstrained Medium-Term Fixed Income ETF | 3.99% | 3.89% | 4.06% | 3.78% | 3.23% | 3.24% | 2.73% | 2.90% | 2.62% | 0.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFIU and FAAR have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAAR has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to FFIU (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFIU dropped -20.43% vs FAAR's -18.03%.
On 5-year performance, FAAR leads with 7.89% vs -0.16% for FFIU. On fees, FFIU is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, FFIU has been the lower-risk option at 1.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FAAR has performed better with a 7.89% return vs -0.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FFIU is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.57%, compared with 3.99% for FFIU.
FFIU is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Mcivy Co. LLC and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for FFIU and 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFIU and FAAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer