PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFIDX vs. FSLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFIDX vs. FSLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fund (FFIDX) and Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund (FSLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFIDX achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than FSLEX's 13.30% return. Over the past 10 years, FFIDX has outperformed FSLEX with an annualized return of 15.27%, while FSLEX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.20% annualized return.


FFIDX

1D
1.17%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
1.42%
6M
2.47%
1Y
19.24%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
12.27%
10Y*
15.27%

FSLEX

1D
2.90%
1M
1.27%
YTD
13.30%
6M
12.05%
1Y
30.90%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
14.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFIDX vs. FSLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFIDX
Fidelity Fund
1.42%20.04%27.13%30.93%-25.88%33.22%26.43%33.46%-5.31%23.28%
FSLEX
Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund
13.30%20.38%20.01%26.29%-26.05%30.30%21.56%26.86%-13.49%24.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FFIDX and FSLEX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 1989

0.76

The correlation between FFIDX and FSLEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFIDX vs. FSLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFIDX
FFIDX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FFIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FFIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FSLEX
FSLEX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FSLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFIDX vs. FSLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fund (FFIDX) and Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund (FSLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFIDXFSLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

2.63

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.01

10.32

-3.31

FFIDX vs. FSLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the FSLEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFIDX and FSLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFIDX vs. FSLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFIDX drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, which is greater than FSLEX's maximum drawdown of -50.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFIDX and FSLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFIDXFSLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.35%

-50.21%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-11.41%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.42%

-24.04%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.33%

-32.67%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.66%

-39.77%

+9.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.92%

-3.45%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.85%

-13.92%

+2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.90%

-0.29%

Volatility

FFIDX vs. FSLEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Fund (FFIDX) is 3.70%, while Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund (FSLEX) has a volatility of 7.18%. This indicates that FFIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFIDXFSLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

7.18%

-3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.48%

13.72%

-4.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.77%

17.12%

-4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.18%

20.80%

-1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.43%

21.53%

-2.10%

FFIDX vs. FSLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFIDX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FSLEX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFIDX vs. FSLEX - Dividend Comparison

FFIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than FSLEX's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFIDX
Fidelity Fund
1.16%1.18%0.00%2.41%0.67%4.60%2.71%5.41%7.40%11.12%7.01%5.48%
FSLEX
Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund
1.60%0.37%0.41%0.39%0.69%7.74%6.41%2.17%6.39%6.19%1.29%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFIDX and FSLEX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSLEX has higher volatility (7.18%) compared to FFIDX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFIDX dropped -55.35% vs FSLEX's -50.21%.

FSLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFIDX and FSLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer