PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FSLEX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FSLEX and FBGRX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

FSLEX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund (FSLEX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
13.72%
11.01%
FSLEX
FBGRX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FSLEX:

1.80

FBGRX:

1.58

Sortino Ratio

FSLEX:

2.39

FBGRX:

2.12

Omega Ratio

FSLEX:

1.31

FBGRX:

1.29

Calmar Ratio

FSLEX:

1.78

FBGRX:

2.16

Martin Ratio

FSLEX:

11.15

FBGRX:

6.57

Ulcer Index

FSLEX:

2.74%

FBGRX:

4.95%

Daily Std Dev

FSLEX:

16.99%

FBGRX:

20.58%

Max Drawdown

FSLEX:

-50.21%

FBGRX:

-55.96%

Current Drawdown

FSLEX:

-0.56%

FBGRX:

-2.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLEX achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's 2.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLEX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 8.61%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.67% annualized return.


FSLEX

YTD

5.53%

1M

3.95%

6M

9.94%

1Y

28.80%

5Y*

9.63%

10Y*

8.61%

FBGRX

YTD

2.62%

1M

1.06%

6M

6.79%

1Y

30.42%

5Y*

15.39%

10Y*

13.67%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSLEX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FSLEX and FBGRX have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


FSLEX
Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund
Expense ratio chart for FSLEX: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%
Expense ratio chart for FBGRX: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSLEX vs. FBGRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLEX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSLEX is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSLEX is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSLEX is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSLEX is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSLEX is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSLEX is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBGRX is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FSLEX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund (FSLEX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FSLEX, currently valued at 1.80, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.801.58
The chart of Sortino ratio for FSLEX, currently valued at 2.39, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.392.12
The chart of Omega ratio for FSLEX, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.311.29
The chart of Calmar ratio for FSLEX, currently valued at 1.78, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.782.16
The chart of Martin ratio for FSLEX, currently valued at 11.15, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.0011.156.57
FSLEX
FBGRX

The current FSLEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLEX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.80
1.58
FSLEX
FBGRX

Dividends

FSLEX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FSLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than FBGRX's 0.23% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FSLEX
Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund
0.39%0.41%0.39%0.69%0.28%0.87%0.86%1.00%0.83%0.71%3.70%14.89%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
0.23%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.09%0.22%5.07%6.08%

Drawdowns

FSLEX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLEX drawdown since its inception was -50.21%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -55.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLEX and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.56%
-2.18%
FSLEX
FBGRX

Volatility

FSLEX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund (FSLEX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) have volatilities of 6.74% and 6.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.74%
6.52%
FSLEX
FBGRX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab