PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFH.TO vs. TEL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FFH.TO vs. TEL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (FFH.TO) and TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FFH.TO is traded in CAD, while TEL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TEL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFH.TO achieves a -12.76% return, which is significantly lower than TEL's -5.00% return. Over the past 10 years, FFH.TO has underperformed TEL with an annualized return of 15.19%, while TEL has yielded a comparatively higher 16.33% annualized return.


FFH.TO

1D
-0.71%
1M
4.27%
YTD
-12.76%
6M
-6.84%
1Y
-3.12%
3Y*
33.68%
5Y*
34.18%
10Y*
15.19%

TEL

1D
1.46%
1M
4.17%
YTD
-5.00%
6M
-6.65%
1Y
34.79%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
13.97%
10Y*
16.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFH.TO vs. TEL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFH.TO
Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited
-12.76%32.23%66.26%54.96%31.51%47.26%-27.31%3.64%-8.51%5.43%
TEL
TE Connectivity Ltd.
-5.00%54.23%12.28%21.66%-23.08%35.05%25.89%24.03%-12.05%30.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FFH.TO and TEL is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007

0.14

The correlation between FFH.TO and TEL shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FFH.TO:

CA$50.62B

TEL:

$62.06B

EPS

FFH.TO:

$205.21

TEL:

$9.78

PE Ratio

FFH.TO:

7.89

TEL:

21.50

PEG Ratio

FFH.TO:

0.13

TEL:

3.98

PS Ratio

FFH.TO:

1.22

TEL:

3.37

PB Ratio

FFH.TO:

1.40

TEL:

4.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

FFH.TO:

$29.34B

TEL:

$18.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FFH.TO:

$6.18B

TEL:

$6.55B

EBITDA (TTM)

FFH.TO:

$7.83B

TEL:

$4.47B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFH.TO vs. TEL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFH.TO
FFH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FFH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FFH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

TEL
TEL Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEL Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEL Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFH.TO vs. TEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (FFH.TO) and TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFH.TOTELDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.19

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

1.37

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.27

2.94

-3.21

FFH.TO vs. TEL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFH.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the TEL Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFH.TO and TEL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFH.TO vs. TEL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFH.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.23%, smaller than the maximum TEL drawdown of -76.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFH.TO and TEL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFH.TOTELDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.23%

-76.38%

+20.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.88%

-22.99%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

-23.65%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.88%

-31.18%

+12.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.23%

-42.47%

-13.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.04%

-15.42%

+2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.53%

-12.75%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.44%

10.70%

-2.26%

Volatility

FFH.TO vs. TEL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (FFH.TO) is 5.99%, while TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) has a volatility of 10.12%. This indicates that FFH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFH.TOTELDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

10.12%

-4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.64%

28.55%

-10.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.63%

34.29%

-11.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.99%

28.80%

-4.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.56%

28.98%

-3.42%

Dividends

FFH.TO vs. TEL - Dividend Comparison

FFH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than TEL's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFH.TO
Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited
0.92%0.83%1.01%1.10%1.56%2.03%3.01%2.18%2.07%1.95%2.24%1.82%
TEL
TE Connectivity Ltd.
1.38%1.22%1.78%1.66%1.90%1.23%1.57%1.90%2.27%1.65%2.08%1.98%

Financials

FFH.TO vs. TEL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited and TE Connectivity Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
6.41B
4.74B
(FFH.TO) Total Revenue
(TEL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FFH.TO vs. TEL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited and TE Connectivity Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
15.4%
36.8%
Portfolio components
FFH.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 986.70M and revenue of 6.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.

TEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.75B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

FFH.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 1.04B and revenue of 6.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

TEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported an operating income of 954.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

FFH.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited reported a net income of 695.70M and revenue of 6.41B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.

TEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TE Connectivity Ltd. reported a net income of 855.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FFH.TO and TEL have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFH.TO and TEL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer