FFH.TO vs. NEM
FFH.TO (Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited) and NEM (Newmont Corporation) are both stocks. FFH.TO operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while NEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, FFH.TO returned 15.19%/yr vs 14.78%/yr for NEM. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FFH.TO vs. NEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FFH.TO is traded in CAD, while NEM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NEM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFH.TO achieves a -12.76% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's 2.86% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FFH.TO having a 15.19% annualized return and NEM not far behind at 14.78%.
FFH.TO
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- -12.76%
- 6M
- -6.84%
- 1Y
- -3.12%
- 3Y*
- 33.68%
- 5Y*
- 34.18%
- 10Y*
- 15.19%
NEM
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- -11.95%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- 79.79%
- 3Y*
- 38.17%
- 5Y*
- 13.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.78%
FFH.TO vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFH.TO Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited | -12.76% | 32.23% | 66.26% | 54.96% | 31.51% | 47.26% | -27.31% | 3.64% | -8.51% | 5.43% |
NEM Newmont Corporation | 2.86% | 160.36% | -0.03% | -10.93% | -15.75% | 7.35% | 36.96% | 25.14% | 1.74% | 3.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFH.TO and NEM is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.01 |
Fundamentals
FFH.TO:
$205.21
NEM:
$6.34
FFH.TO:
7.89
NEM:
15.82
FFH.TO:
0.13
NEM:
0.41
FFH.TO:
1.22
NEM:
4.83
FFH.TO:
$29.34B
NEM:
$17.23B
FFH.TO:
$6.18B
NEM:
$8.97B
FFH.TO:
$7.83B
NEM:
$13.78B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFH.TO vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank
FFH.TO
NEM
FFH.TO vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (FFH.TO) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFH.TO | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.30 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 3.11 | -3.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 8.30 | -8.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFH.TO vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFH.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.23%, smaller than the maximum NEM drawdown of -70.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFH.TO and NEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFH.TO | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.23% | -70.02% | +13.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.88% | -27.50% | +8.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.88% | -33.96% | +15.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.88% | -59.76% | +40.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.23% | -59.76% | +3.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.04% | -21.57% | +8.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.53% | -29.16% | +17.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.44% | 10.30% | -1.86% |
Volatility
FFH.TO vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (FFH.TO) is 5.99%, while Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 15.86%. This indicates that FFH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFH.TO | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 15.86% | -9.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.64% | 37.54% | -19.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.63% | 47.43% | -24.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.99% | 38.16% | -14.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.56% | 36.11% | -10.55% |
Dividends
FFH.TO vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison
FFH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than NEM's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFH.TO Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited | 0.92% | 0.83% | 1.01% | 1.10% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 3.01% | 2.18% | 2.07% | 1.95% | 2.24% | 1.82% |
NEM Newmont Corporation | 1.02% | 1.00% | 2.69% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
Financials
FFH.TO vs. NEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FFH.TO and NEM have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FFH.TO and NEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer