FFGZX vs. TCLEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund (TCLEX).
FFGZX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2009. TCLEX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 14, 2004.
Performance
FFGZX vs. TCLEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFGZX vs. TCLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGZX Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class | -0.78% | 9.13% | 5.02% | 8.32% | -11.07% | 2.85% | 8.59% | 10.68% | -0.80% | 6.73% |
TCLEX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund | -2.01% | 11.22% | 7.31% | 10.64% | -12.64% | 6.62% | 10.95% | 15.14% | -4.14% | 9.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFGZX achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly higher than TCLEX's -2.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FFGZX has underperformed TCLEX with an annualized return of 3.87%, while TCLEX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.43% annualized return.
FFGZX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 6.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.94%
- 5Y*
- 2.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.87%
TCLEX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -4.14%
- YTD
- -2.01%
- 6M
- -0.24%
- 1Y
- 7.97%
- 3Y*
- 7.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.62%
- 10Y*
- 5.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFGZX vs. TCLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFGZX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TCLEX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFGZX vs. TCLEX — Risk / Return Rank
FFGZX
TCLEX
FFGZX vs. TCLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund (TCLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFGZX | TCLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 1.36 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.12 | 1.90 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.27 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 1.72 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.42 | 7.09 | +1.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFGZX | TCLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 1.36 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.53 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.78 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.58 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFGZX and TCLEX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FFGZX vs. TCLEX - Dividend Comparison
FFGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, less than TCLEX's 5.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGZX Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class | 3.46% | 3.30% | 3.18% | 2.88% | 3.11% | 2.10% | 2.22% | 7.35% | 3.00% | 1.95% | 1.56% | 1.06% |
TCLEX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund | 5.44% | 5.33% | 4.44% | 2.95% | 5.91% | 8.53% | 6.93% | 3.95% | 5.60% | 1.72% | 3.45% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
FFGZX vs. TCLEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFGZX drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum TCLEX drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGZX and TCLEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFGZX | TCLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.94% | -35.33% | +20.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.33% | -4.49% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.94% | -17.31% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.94% | -17.31% | +2.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.09% | -4.21% | +1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -4.02% | +1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 1.09% | -0.30% |
Volatility
FFGZX vs. TCLEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) is 1.85%, while TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund (TCLEX) has a volatility of 2.22%. This indicates that FFGZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFGZX | TCLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.85% | 2.22% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.78% | 3.67% | -0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.35% | 6.06% | -1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.03% | 6.86% | -1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 6.98% | -2.59% |