FFGTX vs. FXAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX).
FFGTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009. FXAIX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Feb 17, 1988.
Performance
FFGTX vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFGTX vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGTX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M | 22.70% | 27.96% | 2.37% | -5.62% | 20.06% | 25.38% | 5.41% | 17.23% | -13.73% | 17.38% |
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund | -7.05% | 17.84% | 25.01% | 26.29% | -18.14% | 28.71% | 18.42% | 31.48% | -4.43% | 21.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFGTX achieves a 22.70% return, which is significantly higher than FXAIX's -7.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FFGTX having a 13.28% annualized return and FXAIX not far ahead at 13.75%.
FFGTX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 22.70%
- 6M
- 30.84%
- 1Y
- 51.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 15.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
FXAIX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -4.59%
- 1Y
- 14.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFGTX vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFGTX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFGTX vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank
FFGTX
FXAIX
FFGTX vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFGTX | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | 0.84 | +1.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.03 | 1.30 | +1.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.20 | +0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 1.05 | +2.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.47 | 5.13 | +12.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFGTX | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 0.84 | +1.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.68 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.77 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.75 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFGTX and FXAIX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FFGTX vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison
FFGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than FXAIX's 1.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGTX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M | 1.64% | 2.02% | 1.93% | 1.47% | 1.47% | 2.91% | 1.03% | 2.51% | 1.57% | 0.36% | 1.05% | 2.07% |
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund | 1.20% | 1.11% | 1.25% | 1.45% | 1.69% | 1.22% | 1.60% | 2.06% | 2.72% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.83% |
Drawdowns
FFGTX vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFGTX drawdown since its inception was -58.53%, which is greater than FXAIX's maximum drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGTX and FXAIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFGTX | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.53% | -33.79% | -24.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.66% | -12.13% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.31% | -24.50% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.88% | -33.79% | -15.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | -8.89% | +6.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.56% | -3.83% | -16.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 2.50% | +0.35% |
Volatility
FFGTX vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) at 4.24%. This indicates that FFGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFGTX | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 4.24% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.74% | 9.08% | +4.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.50% | 18.13% | +2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.55% | 16.88% | +4.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 18.03% | +4.51% |