FFGTX vs. FCNTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX).
FFGTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009. FCNTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 17, 1967.
Performance
FFGTX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFGTX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGTX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M | 23.99% | 27.96% | 2.37% | -5.62% | 20.06% | 25.38% | 5.41% | 17.23% | -13.73% | 17.38% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | -5.35% | 21.76% | 36.00% | 38.67% | -28.31% | 24.52% | 32.48% | 30.00% | -3.81% | 32.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFGTX achieves a 23.99% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's -5.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FFGTX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 13.40%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.03% annualized return.
FFGTX
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 23.99%
- 6M
- 32.95%
- 1Y
- 52.13%
- 3Y*
- 17.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.12%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
FCNTX
- 1D
- 3.52%
- 1M
- -5.86%
- YTD
- -5.35%
- 6M
- -2.60%
- 1Y
- 19.23%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.21%
- 10Y*
- 16.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFGTX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFGTX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFGTX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank
FFGTX
FCNTX
FFGTX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFGTX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.61 | 1.01 | +1.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.12 | 1.56 | +1.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.22 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 1.79 | +1.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.58 | 6.87 | +11.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFGTX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 1.01 | +1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.69 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.82 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.76 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFGTX and FCNTX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FFGTX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison
FFGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than FCNTX's 4.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGTX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M | 1.63% | 2.02% | 1.93% | 1.47% | 1.47% | 2.91% | 1.03% | 2.51% | 1.57% | 0.36% | 1.05% | 2.07% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | 4.93% | 5.21% | 4.19% | 3.78% | 11.87% | 10.80% | 8.01% | 4.16% | 7.46% | 6.08% | 3.81% | 5.33% |
Drawdowns
FFGTX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFGTX drawdown since its inception was -58.53%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGTX and FCNTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFGTX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.53% | -49.19% | -9.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.66% | -11.30% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.31% | -32.59% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.88% | -32.59% | -16.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -8.18% | +6.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.55% | -8.18% | -12.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 2.95% | -0.10% |
Volatility
FFGTX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) is 6.17%, while Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that FFGTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFGTX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.17% | 6.51% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.76% | 11.12% | +2.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.48% | 19.95% | +0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.55% | 19.19% | +2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 19.64% | +2.91% |