PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFGCX vs. VMNIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFGCX vs. VMNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (VMNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGCX achieves a 23.05% return, which is significantly higher than VMNIX's 11.58% return. Over the past 10 years, FFGCX has outperformed VMNIX with an annualized return of 12.90%, while VMNIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.02% annualized return.


FFGCX

1D
1.24%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
23.05%
6M
27.32%
1Y
50.12%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
12.90%

VMNIX

1D
0.65%
1M
0.71%
YTD
11.58%
6M
12.19%
1Y
17.00%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
5.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGCX vs. VMNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFGCX
Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund
23.05%28.66%2.98%-5.18%20.69%26.08%6.04%17.82%-13.21%17.18%
VMNIX
Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares
11.58%9.36%5.84%12.33%13.47%23.39%-11.58%-9.48%0.66%-4.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGCX and VMNIX is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2009

0.01

The correlation between FFGCX and VMNIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.10 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFGCX vs. VMNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGCX
FFGCX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FFGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

VMNIX
VMNIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VMNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VMNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGCX vs. VMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (VMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFGCXVMNIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.20

2.31

+0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.03

3.48

+0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.42

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.89

3.65

+3.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.99

10.36

+14.63

FFGCX vs. VMNIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGCX Sharpe Ratio is 3.20, which is higher than the VMNIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGCX and VMNIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFGCXVMNIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20

2.31

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

1.81

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.79

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.33

+0.01

Drawdowns

FFGCX vs. VMNIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGCX drawdown since its inception was -57.23%, which is greater than VMNIX's maximum drawdown of -27.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGCX and VMNIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFGCXVMNIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.23%

-27.90%

-29.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.38%

-4.67%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.24%

-5.36%

-13.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.22%

-6.69%

-20.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.43%

-24.95%

-23.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

0.00%

-2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.37%

-8.76%

-10.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

1.74%

+0.29%

Volatility

FFGCX vs. VMNIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (VMNIX) at 2.21%. This indicates that FFGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFGCXVMNIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

2.21%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.26%

5.76%

+7.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.33%

7.81%

+8.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.36%

7.23%

+14.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.43%

6.40%

+16.03%

FFGCX vs. VMNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGCX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than VMNIX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFGCX vs. VMNIX - Dividend Comparison

FFGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than VMNIX's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGCX
Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund
2.05%2.53%2.62%2.01%1.84%3.39%1.61%2.98%2.22%0.36%1.53%2.86%
VMNIX
Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares
3.20%3.59%5.67%5.15%0.78%0.20%0.86%3.23%1.00%1.16%0.45%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFGCX and VMNIX have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFGCX has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to VMNIX (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGCX dropped -57.23% vs VMNIX's -27.90%.

FFGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFGCX and VMNIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer