FFGCX vs. FARMX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FFGCX (Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund) and FARMX (Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund) are both mutual funds - FFGCX is a Commodities fund managed by Fidelity, while FARMX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FFGCX returned 12.96%/yr vs 4.73%/yr for FARMX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFGCX charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for FARMX.

Performance

FFGCX vs. FARMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund (FARMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGCX achieves a 15.94% return, which is significantly lower than FARMX's 16.91% return.

FFGCX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -5.60%
• YTD: 15.94%
• 6M: 15.33%
• 1Y: 36.54%
• 3Y*: 17.56%
• 5Y*: 12.96%
• 10Y*: 12.49%

FARMX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 16.91%
• 6M: 16.46%
• 1Y: 10.28%
• 3Y*: 5.35%
• 5Y*: 4.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGCX vs. FARMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund	15.94%	28.66%	2.98%	-5.18%	20.69%	26.08%	48.23%
FARMX Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund	16.91%	7.99%	-4.83%	-11.61%	13.68%	23.36%	53.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGCX and FARMX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020	0.77

The correlation between FFGCX and FARMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FFGCX vs. FARMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGCX

FFGCX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FFGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FFGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FFGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FFGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FFGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

FARMX

FARMX Risk / Return Rank: 8
FARMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FARMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FARMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FARMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FARMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGCX vs. FARMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund (FARMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFGCX	FARMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	0.62	+1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	1.02	+1.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.12	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.13	0.99	+3.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.91	1.92	+12.99

FFGCX vs. FARMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the FARMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGCX and FARMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFGCX vs. FARMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGCX drawdown since its inception was -57.23%, which is greater than FARMX's maximum drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGCX and FARMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFGCX	FARMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.23%	-30.27%	-26.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.73%	-9.89%	+1.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.24%	-19.81%	+0.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.22%	-30.27%	+3.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.45%	-6.16%	-2.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.32%	-12.77%	-6.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	5.10%	-2.69%

Volatility

FFGCX vs. FARMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund (FARMX) at 3.93%. This indicates that FFGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FARMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFGCX	FARMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.37%	3.93%	+1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.86%	12.13%	+1.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.01%	15.81%	+1.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.37%	18.90%	+2.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.44%	19.65%	+2.79%

FFGCX vs. FARMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGCX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than FARMX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFGCX vs. FARMX - Dividend Comparison

FFGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than FARMX's 1.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FARMX Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund	1.58%	1.85%	2.29%	1.33%	1.17%	0.71%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund	2.18%	2.53%	2.62%	2.01%	1.84%	3.39%	1.61%	2.98%	2.22%	0.36%	1.53%	2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFGCX and FARMX in my portfolio?

FFGCX and FARMX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFGCX or FARMX?

FFGCX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to FARMX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGCX dropped -57.23% vs FARMX's -30.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.