PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFGAX vs. FIFGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFGAX vs. FIFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A (FFGAX) and Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGAX achieves a 19.52% return, which is significantly lower than FIFGX's 43.27% return.


FFGAX

1D
-1.18%
1M
6.20%
6M
6.84%
YTD
19.52%
1Y
41.33%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
12.04%
ALL TIME*
7.31%

FIFGX

1D
0.23%
1M
11.29%
6M
34.90%
YTD
43.27%
1Y
47.28%
3Y*
146.47%
5Y*
75.01%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
50.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FFGAX vs. FIFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FFGAX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A
19.52%28.27%2.63%-5.35%20.37%25.70%5.78%17.54%0.54%
FIFGX
Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused
43.27%7.44%6.34%781.04%9.30%32.92%1.48%9.32%-2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGAX and FIFGX is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2018

0.58

The correlation between FFGAX and FIFGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFGAX vs. FIFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFGAX
FFGAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FFGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FIFGX
FIFGX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FIFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FIFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFGAX vs. FIFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A (FFGAX) and Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFGAXFIFGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.34

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

2.77

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.00

9.38

+1.63

FFGAX vs. FIFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the FIFGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGAX and FIFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFGAX vs. FIFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGAX drawdown since its inception was -57.71%, which is greater than FIFGX's maximum drawdown of -29.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGAX and FIFGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFGAXFIFGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.71%

-29.47%

-28.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.27%

-16.42%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.46%

-16.42%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.29%

-29.47%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.52%

-6.15%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.70%

-7.72%

-11.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

4.90%

-1.23%

Volatility

FFGAX vs. FIFGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A (FFGAX) is 4.49%, while Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused (FIFGX) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that FFGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFGAXFIFGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

7.04%

-2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.87%

19.39%

-5.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.12%

22.14%

-5.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.28%

406.16%

-384.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.37%

329.29%

-306.92%

FFGAX vs. FIFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGAX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FIFGX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFGAX vs. FIFGX - Dividend Comparison

FFGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than FIFGX's 3.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGAX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A
1.88%2.24%2.32%1.79%1.68%3.16%1.30%2.84%1.93%0.36%1.29%2.51%
FIFGX
Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused
3.80%5.44%4.73%1.54%12.64%35.77%3.10%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFGAX and FIFGX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIFGX has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to FFGAX (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGAX dropped -57.71% vs FIFGX's -29.47%.

FFGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFGAX and FIFGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer