PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFFHX vs. FRKMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFFHX vs. FRKMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFFHX achieves a 14.32% return, which is significantly lower than FRKMX's 15,640,638.04% return.


FFFHX

1D
-0.28%
1M
2.99%
YTD
14.32%
6M
13.82%
1Y
30.83%
3Y*
20.68%
5Y*
10.53%
10Y*
12.92%

FRKMX

1D
15,089,900.00%
1M
15,188,508.30%
YTD
15,640,638.04%
6M
15,640,103.84%
1Y
16,476,807.18%
3Y*
5,609.31%
5Y*
1,016.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFFHX vs. FRKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FFFHX
Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund
14.32%23.72%14.11%20.45%-18.29%16.59%18.25%8.99%
FRKMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K
15,640,638.04%9.91%4.40%8.17%-11.57%2.88%8.68%3.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FFFHX and FRKMX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.74

The correlation between FFFHX and FRKMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFFHX vs. FRKMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFFHX
FFFHX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FFFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FRKMX
FRKMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FRKMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRKMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRKMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FRKMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRKMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFFHX vs. FRKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFFHXFRKMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5,218,025.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

727,316.16

-727,314.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

5,078,659.88

-5,078,656.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.34

21,305,391.80

-21,305,377.46

FFFHX vs. FRKMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFFHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the FRKMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFFHX and FRKMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFFHX vs. FRKMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFFHX drawdown since its inception was -56.38%, which is greater than FRKMX's maximum drawdown of -16.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFHX and FRKMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFFHXFRKMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.38%

-16.04%

-40.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.70%

-3.42%

-6.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-4.93%

-10.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.39%

-16.04%

-11.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

0.00%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.81%

-3.54%

-5.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

0.81%

+1.41%

Volatility

FFFHX vs. FRKMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) is 5.60%, while Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX) has a volatility of 1,192.42%. This indicates that FFFHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRKMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFFHXFRKMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

1,192.42%

-1,186.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.57%

1,192.41%

-1,180.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.66%

15,119,929.64%

-15,119,915.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

6,761,838.11%

-6,761,822.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.44%

5,765,888.45%

-5,765,873.01%

FFFHX vs. FRKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFHX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FRKMX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFFHX vs. FRKMX - Dividend Comparison

FFFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, less than FRKMX's 103.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFHX
Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund
5.23%4.14%1.86%1.78%11.83%11.76%4.93%6.48%7.69%3.98%4.12%4.16%
FRKMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K
103.36%3.11%3.12%2.92%4.66%3.65%2.56%1.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFFHX and FRKMX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRKMX has higher volatility (1192.42%) compared to FFFHX (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFHX dropped -56.38% vs FRKMX's -16.04%.

FFFHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFFHX and FRKMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer