PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFFHX vs. FFBQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFFHX vs. FFBQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FFFHX having a 13.62% return and FFBQX slightly higher at 14.03%.


FFFHX

1D
0.62%
1M
5.06%
YTD
13.62%
6M
15.48%
1Y
31.03%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
12.41%

FFBQX

1D
0.68%
1M
5.43%
YTD
14.03%
6M
15.51%
1Y
31.26%
3Y*
21.53%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFFHX vs. FFBQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FFFHX
Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund
13.62%23.72%14.11%20.45%-18.29%16.59%18.25%8.99%
FFBQX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6
14.03%22.90%16.84%20.67%-18.86%16.47%18.10%9.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FFFHX and FFBQX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.99

The correlation between FFFHX and FFBQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFFHX vs. FFBQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFFHX
FFFHX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FFFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FFBQX
FFBQX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FFBQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFBQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFBQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFBQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFBQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFFHX vs. FFBQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFFHXFFBQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.46

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

3.28

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.45

14.54

-0.10

FFFHX vs. FFBQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFFHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the FFBQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFFHX and FFBQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFFHXFFBQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.50

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.73

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.79

-0.32

Drawdowns

FFFHX vs. FFBQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFFHX drawdown since its inception was -56.38%, which is greater than FFBQX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFHX and FFBQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFFHXFFBQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.38%

-31.34%

-25.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.70%

-9.67%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-15.51%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.39%

-27.60%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.83%

-5.97%

-2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

2.17%

+0.01%

Volatility

FFFHX vs. FFBQX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX) have volatilities of 4.25% and 4.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFFHXFFBQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

4.18%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.46%

10.39%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

12.67%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.00%

15.10%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.38%

17.25%

-1.87%

FFFHX vs. FFBQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFHX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FFBQX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFFHX vs. FFBQX - Dividend Comparison

FFFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than FFBQX's 3.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFBQX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6
3.32%2.58%5.66%2.07%5.40%6.98%3.62%2.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FFFHX
Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund
5.27%4.14%1.86%1.78%11.83%11.76%4.93%6.48%7.69%3.98%4.12%4.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FFFHX and FFBQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFFHX has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to FFBQX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFHX dropped -56.38% vs FFBQX's -31.34%.

FFBQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFFHX and FFBQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer