PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFEM vs. AVEG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFEM vs. AVEG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVEG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FFEM is traded in USD, while AVEG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the AVEG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFEM achieves a 33.06% return, which is significantly higher than AVEG.L's 23.58% return.


FFEM

1D
-1.56%
1M
9.73%
YTD
33.06%
6M
36.71%
1Y
68.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVEG.L

1D
-0.98%
1M
8.55%
YTD
23.58%
6M
26.78%
1Y
48.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFEM vs. AVEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FFEM and AVEG.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025

0.79

The correlation between FFEM and AVEG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFEM vs. AVEG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFEM
FFEM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

AVEG.L
AVEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AVEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AVEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFEM vs. AVEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFEMAVEG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.19

2.71

+0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.00

3.62

+0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.48

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.07

3.69

+1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.18

14.26

+5.91

FFEM vs. AVEG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFEM Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is comparable to the AVEG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFEM and AVEG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFEMAVEG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

2.71

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.21

2.35

-0.13

Drawdowns

FFEM vs. AVEG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFEM drawdown since its inception was -16.29%, which is greater than AVEG.L's maximum drawdown of -13.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEM and AVEG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFEMAVEG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.29%

-13.65%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.57%

-13.13%

-0.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-0.98%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-2.05%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

3.41%

0.00%

Volatility

FFEM vs. AVEG.L - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVEG.L) at 7.33%. This indicates that FFEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFEMAVEG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.03%

7.33%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.77%

15.05%

+3.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.56%

17.90%

+3.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.02%

19.28%

+2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.02%

19.28%

+2.74%

FFEM vs. AVEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFEM vs. AVEG.L - Dividend Comparison

FFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, while AVEG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


FFEM and AVEG.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AVEG.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AVEG.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FFEM.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FFEM and 0.35% for AVEG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFEM and AVEG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer