FFEM vs. AVEG.L
FFEM (Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF) and AVEG.L (Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past year, FFEM returned 68.49% vs 48.71% for AVEG.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFEM charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for AVEG.L.
Performance
FFEM vs. AVEG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FFEM is traded in USD, while AVEG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the AVEG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFEM achieves a 33.06% return, which is significantly higher than AVEG.L's 23.58% return.
FFEM
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 9.73%
- YTD
- 33.06%
- 6M
- 36.71%
- 1Y
- 68.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVEG.L
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 8.55%
- YTD
- 23.58%
- 6M
- 26.78%
- 1Y
- 48.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FFEM vs. AVEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF | 33.06% | 30.35% |
AVEG.L Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 23.58% | 26.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFEM and AVEG.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025 | 0.79 |
The correlation between FFEM and AVEG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFEM vs. AVEG.L — Risk / Return Rank
FFEM
AVEG.L
FFEM vs. AVEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFEM | AVEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.19 | 2.71 | +0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.00 | 3.62 | +0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.48 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.07 | 3.69 | +1.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.18 | 14.26 | +5.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFEM | AVEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19 | 2.71 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.21 | 2.35 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
FFEM vs. AVEG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFEM drawdown since its inception was -16.29%, which is greater than AVEG.L's maximum drawdown of -13.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEM and AVEG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFEM | AVEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.29% | -13.65% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.57% | -13.13% | -0.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -0.98% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -2.05% | -0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 3.41% | 0.00% |
Volatility
FFEM vs. AVEG.L - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVEG.L) at 7.33%. This indicates that FFEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFEM | AVEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.03% | 7.33% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.77% | 15.05% | +3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.56% | 17.90% | +3.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 19.28% | +2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 19.28% | +2.74% |
FFEM vs. AVEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFEM vs. AVEG.L - Dividend Comparison
FFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, while AVEG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AVEG.L Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF | 1.22% | 1.59% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFEM and AVEG.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVEG.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVEG.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FFEM.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FFEM and 0.35% for AVEG.L.
Find the right allocation for FFEM and AVEG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer