PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFDI vs. FELC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFDI vs. FELC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF (FFDI) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFDI achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than FELC's 12.07% return.


FFDI

1D
0.15%
1M
-1.27%
6M
3.71%
YTD
8.00%
1Y
14.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.69%

FELC

1D
0.78%
1M
1.74%
6M
10.77%
YTD
12.07%
1Y
24.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$30.02M$28.83M$35.31M
$92.88K$71.34K$81.38K

FFDI vs. FELC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FFDI
Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF
8.00%26.66%-9.21%
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
12.07%17.09%-0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FFDI and FELC is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

0.72

The correlation between FFDI and FELC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFDI vs. FELC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFDI
FFDI Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FFDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFDI Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FFDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFDI Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FELC
FELC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FELC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FELC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELC Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFDI vs. FELC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF (FFDI) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFDIFELCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.32

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

2.52

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.36

10.93

-6.57

FFDI vs. FELC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFDI Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the FELC Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFDI and FELC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFDI vs. FELC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFDI drawdown since its inception was -14.39%, smaller than the maximum FELC drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFDI and FELC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFDIFELCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.39%

-18.59%

+4.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.85%

-9.09%

-2.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-0.30%

-2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-1.89%

-0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

2.09%

+1.15%

Volatility

FFDI vs. FELC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF (FFDI) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) at 3.60%. This indicates that FFDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FELC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFDIFELCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

3.60%

+2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.59%

10.15%

+6.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.44%

12.95%

+5.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.85%

15.17%

+4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.85%

15.17%

+4.68%

FFDI vs. FELC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFDI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FELC's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFDI vs. FELC - Dividend Comparison

FFDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than FELC's 0.84% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
0.84%0.92%1.03%0.04%
FFDI
Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF
2.00%2.16%0.39%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFDI and FELC have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFDI has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to FELC (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFDI dropped -14.39% vs FELC's -18.59%.

On 1-year performance, FELC leads with 24.76% vs 14.90% for FFDI. On fees, FELC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FELC has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FELC has performed better with a 24.76% return vs 14.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FELC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FFDI.

FFDI has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.84% for FELC.

FFDI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FELC is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FFDI and 0.18% for FELC.

FELC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFDI and FELC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer