FFCMX vs. AOBLX

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

FFCMX (Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class C) and AOBLX (Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, FFCMX returned 6.87%/yr vs 10.27%/yr for AOBLX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FFCMX charges 1.68%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for AOBLX.

Performance

FFCMX vs. AOBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class C (FFCMX) and Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A (AOBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFCMX achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly lower than AOBLX's 14.67% return. Over the past 10 years, FFCMX has underperformed AOBLX with an annualized return of 6.87%, while AOBLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.27% annualized return.

FFCMX

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 0.39%
• 6M: 8.52%
• YTD: 8.52%
• 1Y: 16.10%
• 3Y*: 11.50%
• 5Y*: 5.05%
• 10Y*: 6.87%

AOBLX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 1.48%
• 6M: 14.67%
• YTD: 14.67%
• 1Y: 29.89%
• 3Y*: 17.02%
• 5Y*: 9.24%
• 10Y*: 10.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFCMX vs. AOBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFCMX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class C	8.52%	13.76%	7.41%	11.86%	-15.81%	8.73%	13.45%	17.01%	-6.37%	12.67%
AOBLX Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A	14.67%	19.59%	9.46%	15.00%	-14.64%	15.10%	13.15%	21.75%	-4.63%	14.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FFCMX and AOBLX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2005	0.93

The correlation between FFCMX and AOBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFCMX vs. AOBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFCMX

FFCMX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FFCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FFCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FFCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FFCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FFCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

AOBLX

AOBLX Risk / Return Rank: 94
AOBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AOBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
AOBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AOBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
AOBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFCMX vs. AOBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class C (FFCMX) and Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A (AOBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFCMX	AOBLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	3.03	-1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	4.28	-1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.56	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	4.70	-2.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.88	21.64	-10.76

FFCMX vs. AOBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFCMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the AOBLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFCMX and AOBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFCMX vs. AOBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFCMX drawdown since its inception was -38.54%, which is greater than AOBLX's maximum drawdown of -36.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFCMX and AOBLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFCMX	AOBLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.54%	-36.70%	-1.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.25%	-6.42%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.56%	-13.52%	+3.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.34%	-20.48%	-0.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.34%	-24.31%	+2.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	0.00%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.84%	-3.80%	-1.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.47%	1.39%	+0.08%

Volatility

FFCMX vs. AOBLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class C (FFCMX) and Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A (AOBLX) have volatilities of 3.72% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFCMX	AOBLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.72%	3.69%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.28%	7.88%	-0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.54%	9.95%	-1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.43%	11.16%	-1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.30%	11.32%	-2.02%

FFCMX vs. AOBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFCMX has a 1.68% expense ratio, which is higher than AOBLX's 0.93% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFCMX vs. AOBLX - Dividend Comparison

FFCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than AOBLX's 3.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOBLX Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A	3.15%	3.48%	2.28%	1.52%	2.97%	8.33%	4.31%	5.78%	9.70%	9.22%	2.51%	3.97%
FFCMX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class C	6.06%	6.64%	2.88%	1.20%	5.83%	1.99%	1.47%	3.21%	4.23%	3.19%	0.92%	4.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFCMX and AOBLX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FFCMX and AOBLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FFCMX or AOBLX?

FFCMX has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to AOBLX (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFCMX dropped -38.54% vs AOBLX's -36.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AOBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.