PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFBQX vs. FFSZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFBQX vs. FFSZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FFBQX having a 12.17% return and FFSZX slightly higher at 12.19%.


FFBQX

1D
2.34%
1M
-1.02%
6M
8.20%
YTD
12.17%
1Y
24.58%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.93%

FFSZX

1D
2.27%
1M
-1.15%
6M
8.08%
YTD
12.19%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FFBQX vs. FFSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FFBQX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6
12.17%22.90%16.84%20.67%-18.86%16.47%18.10%9.13%
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
12.19%24.08%14.41%20.78%-18.05%16.81%18.36%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FFBQX and FFSZX is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.99

The correlation between FFBQX and FFSZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFBQX vs. FFSZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFBQX
FFBQX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FFBQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFBQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFBQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FFBQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFBQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FFSZX
FFSZX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FFSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFBQX vs. FFSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFBQXFFSZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.37

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.87

9.95

-0.08

FFBQX vs. FFSZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFBQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the FFSZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFBQX and FFSZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFBQX vs. FFSZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFBQX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, roughly equal to the maximum FFSZX drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFBQX and FFSZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFBQXFFSZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-31.00%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-9.77%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.51%

-15.36%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.60%

-27.17%

-0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-2.50%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-5.72%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

2.33%

-0.02%

Volatility

FFBQX vs. FFSZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) have volatilities of 4.40% and 4.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFBQXFFSZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

4.37%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

12.44%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.31%

14.42%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

15.27%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.27%

17.09%

+0.18%

FFBQX vs. FFSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFBQX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSZX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFBQX vs. FFSZX - Dividend Comparison

FFBQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than FFSZX's 5.11% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FFBQX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6
3.38%2.58%5.66%2.07%5.40%6.98%3.62%2.96%
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
5.11%3.82%2.92%2.26%8.99%7.98%2.41%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FFBQX and FFSZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFBQX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to FFSZX (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFBQX dropped -31.34% vs FFSZX's -31.00%.

FFSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFBQX and FFSZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer