FFAMX vs. FSRKX
FFAMX (Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class A) and FSRKX (Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, FFAMX returned 6.16%/yr vs 6.31%/yr for FSRKX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFAMX charges 0.92%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for FSRKX.
Performance
FFAMX vs. FSRKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFAMX achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly higher than FSRKX's 6.77% return.
FFAMX
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 8.96%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- 1Y
- 19.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- 7.71%
FSRKX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 6M
- 6.89%
- 1Y
- 12.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.03%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- —
FFAMX vs. FSRKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFAMX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class A | 8.96% | 14.64% | 8.14% | 12.76% | -15.20% | 9.54% | 14.36% | 5.78% |
FSRKX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 | 6.77% | 10.59% | 6.00% | 4.81% | -3.13% | 16.06% | 3.94% | 1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFAMX and FSRKX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FFAMX and FSRKX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFAMX vs. FSRKX — Risk / Return Rank
FFAMX
FSRKX
FFAMX vs. FSRKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class A (FFAMX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFAMX | FSRKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.50 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 4.97 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.63 | 19.90 | -6.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFAMX vs. FSRKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFAMX drawdown since its inception was -38.01%, which is greater than FSRKX's maximum drawdown of -19.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFAMX and FSRKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFAMX | FSRKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.01% | -19.93% | -18.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.18% | -2.57% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.33% | -5.84% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.78% | -12.74% | -8.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.57% | +2.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -3.20% | -1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | 0.64% | +0.81% |
Volatility
FFAMX vs. FSRKX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class A (FFAMX) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX) at 1.32%. This indicates that FFAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFAMX | FSRKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.62% | 1.32% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.17% | 3.78% | +3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.46% | 4.87% | +3.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.41% | 6.94% | +2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.34% | 7.78% | +1.56% |
FFAMX vs. FSRKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFAMX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRKX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFAMX vs. FSRKX - Dividend Comparison
FFAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than FSRKX's 4.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFAMX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class A | 6.70% | 7.33% | 3.61% | 1.91% | 6.48% | 2.64% | 2.13% | 3.94% | 4.96% | 3.67% | 1.48% | 5.45% |
FSRKX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 | 4.33% | 4.83% | 4.98% | 5.38% | 7.38% | 5.43% | 2.31% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFAMX and FSRKX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFAMX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to FSRKX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFAMX dropped -38.01% vs FSRKX's -19.93%.
FSRKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFAMX and FSRKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer