PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFAAX vs. SHAPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFAAX vs. SHAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Global Allocation Fund (FFAAX) and ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFAAX achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly higher than SHAPX's 3.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FFAAX has underperformed SHAPX with an annualized return of 8.02%, while SHAPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.


FFAAX

1D
-1.30%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
6.71%
6M
6.04%
1Y
16.78%
3Y*
14.46%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
8.02%

SHAPX

1D
-1.08%
1M
-2.63%
YTD
3.19%
6M
2.25%
1Y
12.33%
3Y*
16.06%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
13.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFAAX vs. SHAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFAAX
Franklin Global Allocation Fund
6.71%16.24%13.12%13.24%-11.61%12.01%1.70%18.06%-9.60%11.59%
SHAPX
ClearBridge Appreciation Fund
3.19%14.32%22.37%19.50%-12.56%23.52%14.53%29.84%-2.19%18.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FFAAX and SHAPX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2003

0.86

The correlation between FFAAX and SHAPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFAAX vs. SHAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFAAX
FFAAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FFAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FFAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SHAPX
SHAPX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SHAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SHAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFAAX vs. SHAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Global Allocation Fund (FFAAX) and ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFAAXSHAPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.22

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

1.54

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.86

6.82

+5.04

FFAAX vs. SHAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the SHAPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFAAX and SHAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFAAX vs. SHAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFAAX drawdown since its inception was -52.89%, which is greater than SHAPX's maximum drawdown of -46.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFAAX and SHAPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFAAXSHAPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.89%

-46.19%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.64%

-8.74%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.89%

-16.15%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.17%

-20.53%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.09%

-32.21%

+2.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-3.16%

+1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-4.77%

-2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

1.97%

-0.47%

Volatility

FFAAX vs. SHAPX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Global Allocation Fund (FFAAX) and ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX) have volatilities of 3.76% and 3.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFAAXSHAPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

3.93%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.77%

8.60%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.20%

10.99%

-1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.14%

14.93%

-4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.40%

16.74%

-5.34%

FFAAX vs. SHAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFAAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than SHAPX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFAAX vs. SHAPX - Dividend Comparison

FFAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than SHAPX's 13.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFAAX
Franklin Global Allocation Fund
5.03%5.12%1.33%1.88%4.66%0.90%7.65%3.24%4.24%3.19%2.40%3.22%
SHAPX
ClearBridge Appreciation Fund
13.64%14.08%9.00%4.17%8.85%6.54%4.13%7.09%6.71%5.10%3.29%4.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFAAX and SHAPX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHAPX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to FFAAX (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFAAX dropped -52.89% vs SHAPX's -46.19%.

FFAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFAAX and SHAPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer