PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFA vs. BMCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFA vs. BMCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund (FFA) and BlackRock High Equity Income Fund (BMCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFA achieves a 4.62% return, which is significantly lower than BMCIX's 9.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FFA has outperformed BMCIX with an annualized return of 13.49%, while BMCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.73% annualized return.


FFA

1D
1.03%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
4.62%
6M
7.84%
1Y
22.35%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*
13.49%

BMCIX

1D
0.76%
1M
3.73%
YTD
9.40%
6M
10.51%
1Y
23.08%
3Y*
13.20%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFA vs. BMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFA
First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund
4.62%14.23%21.46%24.73%-20.26%28.69%10.82%43.35%-13.93%28.97%
BMCIX
BlackRock High Equity Income Fund
9.40%17.11%7.80%10.05%-2.62%22.41%-1.56%22.00%-6.25%16.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FFA and BMCIX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2004

0.68

The correlation between FFA and BMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFA vs. BMCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFA
FFA Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFA Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

BMCIX
BMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFA vs. BMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund (FFA) and BlackRock High Equity Income Fund (BMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFABMCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

2.42

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.04

10.33

-0.29

FFA vs. BMCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the BMCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFA and BMCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFA vs. BMCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFA drawdown since its inception was -57.51%, smaller than the maximum BMCIX drawdown of -72.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFA and BMCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFABMCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.51%

-72.64%

+15.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.15%

-9.51%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.94%

-13.69%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.96%

-18.63%

-11.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.35%

-38.24%

-6.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

-0.44%

-1.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-18.80%

+10.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

2.23%

0.00%

Volatility

FFA vs. BMCIX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund (FFA) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to BlackRock High Equity Income Fund (BMCIX) at 3.71%. This indicates that FFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFABMCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

3.71%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

8.83%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

11.13%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.38%

13.47%

+3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.73%

15.77%

+3.96%

FFA vs. BMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFA has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than BMCIX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFA vs. BMCIX - Dividend Comparison

FFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, less than BMCIX's 7.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMCIX
BlackRock High Equity Income Fund
7.60%7.86%7.66%6.75%6.60%6.58%4.50%3.95%9.41%50.24%5.51%8.16%
FFA
First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund
6.69%6.70%6.59%6.90%7.99%5.92%6.47%6.61%8.82%6.83%7.07%7.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFA and BMCIX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFA has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to BMCIX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFA dropped -57.51% vs BMCIX's -72.64%.

BMCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFA and BMCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer