PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEYCX vs. MHELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEYCX vs. MHELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class C (FEYCX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEYCX achieves a 13.65% return, which is significantly lower than MHELX's 17.65% return. Over the past 10 years, FEYCX has outperformed MHELX with an annualized return of 10.78%, while MHELX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.94% annualized return.


FEYCX

1D
0.57%
1M
5.15%
YTD
13.65%
6M
14.76%
1Y
29.75%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
10.78%

MHELX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.75%
YTD
17.65%
6M
20.19%
1Y
39.35%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEYCX vs. MHELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEYCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class C
13.65%19.59%11.42%17.77%-19.43%15.90%18.08%24.93%-10.15%20.93%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
17.65%3.45%12.51%16.30%-20.27%14.07%20.57%22.49%-12.76%12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FEYCX and MHELX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2005

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between FEYCX and MHELX has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEYCX vs. MHELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEYCX
FEYCX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FEYCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEYCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEYCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FEYCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEYCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

MHELX
MHELX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MHELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHELX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MHELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHELX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEYCX vs. MHELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class C (FEYCX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEYCXMHELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.39

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

4.64

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.13

15.69

-1.56

FEYCX vs. MHELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEYCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the MHELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEYCX and MHELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEYCXMHELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.06

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.24

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.43

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.33

+0.13

Drawdowns

FEYCX vs. MHELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEYCX drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, smaller than the maximum MHELX drawdown of -61.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEYCX and MHELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEYCXMHELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.39%

-61.24%

+7.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-8.52%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.50%

-30.81%

+15.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.73%

-32.01%

+5.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.02%

-39.02%

+8.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.60%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-12.93%

+5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

2.51%

-0.38%

Volatility

FEYCX vs. MHELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class C (FEYCX) is 3.82%, while MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that FEYCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MHELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEYCXMHELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

4.53%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

15.24%

-5.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.25%

19.23%

-6.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.65%

21.00%

-6.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.26%

20.97%

-5.71%

FEYCX vs. MHELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEYCX has a 1.76% expense ratio, which is higher than MHELX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEYCX vs. MHELX - Dividend Comparison

FEYCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than MHELX's 6.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEYCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class C
4.15%4.72%2.46%0.39%4.05%2.20%1.11%4.55%4.49%2.36%0.29%3.88%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
6.13%0.00%2.19%0.00%14.45%5.03%2.70%6.13%0.00%5.17%5.51%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEYCX and MHELX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHELX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to FEYCX (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEYCX dropped -53.39% vs MHELX's -61.24%.

FEYCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEYCX and MHELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer