PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEYCX vs. FSIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEYCX vs. FSIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class C (FEYCX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEYCX achieves a 13.65% return, which is significantly higher than FSIRX's 8.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FEYCX has outperformed FSIRX with an annualized return of 10.78%, while FSIRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.76% annualized return.


FEYCX

1D
0.57%
1M
5.15%
YTD
13.65%
6M
14.76%
1Y
29.75%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
10.78%

FSIRX

1D
0.31%
1M
0.10%
YTD
8.74%
6M
8.99%
1Y
16.71%
3Y*
10.15%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
5.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEYCX vs. FSIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEYCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class C
13.65%19.59%11.42%17.77%-19.43%15.90%18.08%24.93%-10.15%20.93%
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
8.74%10.38%5.83%4.58%-3.34%15.89%3.72%10.55%-3.99%4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FEYCX and FSIRX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2005

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between FEYCX and FSIRX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEYCX vs. FSIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEYCX
FEYCX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FEYCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEYCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEYCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FEYCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEYCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FSIRX
FSIRX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FSIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEYCX vs. FSIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class C (FEYCX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEYCXFSIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.70

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

8.10

-4.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.13

31.92

-17.78

FEYCX vs. FSIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEYCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the FSIRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEYCX and FSIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEYCXFSIRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

3.51

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.92

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.86

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.61

-0.15

Drawdowns

FEYCX vs. FSIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEYCX drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, which is greater than FSIRX's maximum drawdown of -33.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEYCX and FSIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEYCXFSIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.39%

-33.39%

-20.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-2.05%

-7.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.50%

-5.81%

-9.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.73%

-12.82%

-13.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.02%

-19.98%

-11.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.73%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-4.17%

-3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

0.52%

+1.61%

Volatility

FEYCX vs. FSIRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class C (FEYCX) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) at 1.32%. This indicates that FEYCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEYCXFSIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

1.32%

+2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

3.77%

+6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.25%

4.75%

+7.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.65%

6.92%

+7.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.26%

6.74%

+8.52%

FEYCX vs. FSIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEYCX has a 1.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FSIRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEYCX vs. FSIRX - Dividend Comparison

FEYCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, which matches FSIRX's 4.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEYCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class C
4.15%4.72%2.46%0.39%4.05%2.20%1.11%4.55%4.49%2.36%0.29%3.88%
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
4.18%4.72%4.80%5.28%7.33%5.37%2.23%3.09%9.42%2.63%2.37%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEYCX and FSIRX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEYCX has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to FSIRX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEYCX dropped -53.39% vs FSIRX's -33.39%.

FSIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEYCX and FSIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer