FEXU.L vs. FEM.L
FEXU.L (First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF) and FEM.L (First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - FEXU.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while FEM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEXU.L returned 13.63%/yr vs 9.62%/yr for FEM.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEXU.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FEM.L.
Performance
FEXU.L vs. FEM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FEXU.L is traded in USD, while FEM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FEM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEXU.L achieves a 16.91% return, which is significantly higher than FEM.L's 15.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FEXU.L has outperformed FEM.L with an annualized return of 13.63%, while FEM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.62% annualized return.
FEXU.L
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 16.91%
- 6M
- 16.51%
- 1Y
- 30.51%
- 3Y*
- 20.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.31%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
FEM.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- 15.82%
- 6M
- 15.56%
- 1Y
- 32.73%
- 3Y*
- 18.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.62%
FEXU.L vs. FEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEXU.L First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF | 16.91% | 15.23% | 16.68% | 14.66% | -12.27% | 26.82% | 13.52% | 26.07% | -11.03% | 21.55% |
FEM.L First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc | 15.82% | 27.40% | 3.37% | 9.71% | -14.08% | 7.73% | -1.00% | 19.72% | -16.32% | 39.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEXU.L and FEM.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2013 | 0.54 |
The correlation between FEXU.L and FEM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
FEXU.L vs. FEM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEXU.L
FEM.L
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
FEXU.L
FEM.L
Industrials
FEXU.L
FEM.L
Financial Services
FEXU.L
FEM.L
Healthcare
FEXU.L
FEM.L
Consumer Cyclical
FEXU.L
FEM.L
Utilities
FEXU.L
FEM.L
Energy
FEXU.L
FEM.L
Real Estate
FEXU.L
FEM.L
Consumer Defensive
FEXU.L
FEM.L
Basic Materials
FEXU.L
FEM.L
Communication Services
FEXU.L
FEM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEXU.L vs. FEM.L — Risk / Return Rank
FEXU.L
FEM.L
FEXU.L vs. FEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF (FEXU.L) and First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEXU.L | FEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.32 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.46 | 4.00 | +1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.32 | 11.68 | +6.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEXU.L vs. FEM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEXU.L drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, smaller than the maximum FEM.L drawdown of -56.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEXU.L and FEM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEXU.L | FEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.38% | -56.43% | +17.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.56% | -8.14% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.15% | -17.77% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.80% | -31.03% | +10.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.38% | -45.92% | +6.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.23% | +5.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.38% | -25.66% | +21.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 2.80% | -1.14% |
Volatility
FEXU.L vs. FEM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF (FEXU.L) is 4.06%, while First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that FEXU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEXU.L | FEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 6.50% | -2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.95% | 14.52% | -5.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 17.63% | -5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 18.46% | -2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 20.07% | -2.72% |
FEXU.L vs. FEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEXU.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FEM.L's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEXU.L vs. FEM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FEXU.L nor FEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FEXU.L and FEM.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FEXU.L is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FEXU.L is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEM.L.
FEXU.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FEM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. FEXU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FEXU.L and 0.80% for FEM.L.
Find the right allocation for FEXU.L and FEM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer