PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEXU.L vs. FEM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEXU.L vs. FEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF (FEXU.L) and First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FEXU.L is traded in USD, while FEM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FEM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEXU.L achieves a 16.91% return, which is significantly higher than FEM.L's 15.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FEXU.L has outperformed FEM.L with an annualized return of 13.63%, while FEM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.62% annualized return.


FEXU.L

1D
0.72%
1M
3.70%
YTD
16.91%
6M
16.51%
1Y
30.51%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
11.31%
10Y*
13.63%

FEM.L

1D
0.23%
1M
-3.81%
YTD
15.82%
6M
15.56%
1Y
32.73%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
9.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEXU.L vs. FEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEXU.L
First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF
16.91%15.23%16.68%14.66%-12.27%26.82%13.52%26.07%-11.03%21.55%
FEM.L
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc
15.82%27.40%3.37%9.71%-14.08%7.73%-1.00%19.72%-16.32%39.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FEXU.L and FEM.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2013

0.54

The correlation between FEXU.L and FEM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEXU.L vs. FEM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEXU.L
FEM.L

Technology

22.2%
29.0%

Industrials

18.8%
19.6%

Financial Services

13.6%
7.0%

Healthcare

8.8%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
5.5%

Utilities

7.0%
6.0%

Energy

5.6%
12.3%

Real Estate

4.5%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
3.0%

Basic Materials

3.5%
7.6%

Communication Services

3.4%
4.8%

Technology

FEXU.L
22.2%
FEM.L
29.0%

Industrials

FEXU.L
18.8%
FEM.L
19.6%

Financial Services

FEXU.L
13.6%
FEM.L
7.0%

Healthcare

FEXU.L
8.8%
FEM.L
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FEXU.L
8.3%
FEM.L
5.5%

Utilities

FEXU.L
7.0%
FEM.L
6.0%

Energy

FEXU.L
5.6%
FEM.L
12.3%

Real Estate

FEXU.L
4.5%
FEM.L
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

FEXU.L
4.3%
FEM.L
3.0%

Basic Materials

FEXU.L
3.5%
FEM.L
7.6%

Communication Services

FEXU.L
3.4%
FEM.L
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEXU.L vs. FEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEXU.L
FEXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FEXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FEXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FEM.L
FEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEXU.L vs. FEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF (FEXU.L) and First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEXU.LFEM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.32

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.46

4.00

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.32

11.68

+6.65

FEXU.L vs. FEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEXU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the FEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEXU.L and FEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEXU.L vs. FEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEXU.L drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, smaller than the maximum FEM.L drawdown of -56.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEXU.L and FEM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEXU.LFEM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.38%

-56.43%

+17.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.56%

-8.14%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.15%

-17.77%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.80%

-31.03%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.38%

-45.92%

+6.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.23%

+5.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-25.66%

+21.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

2.80%

-1.14%

Volatility

FEXU.L vs. FEM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF (FEXU.L) is 4.06%, while First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that FEXU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEXU.LFEM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

6.50%

-2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.95%

14.52%

-5.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.28%

17.63%

-5.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

18.46%

-2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

20.07%

-2.72%

FEXU.L vs. FEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEXU.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FEM.L's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEXU.L vs. FEM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEXU.L nor FEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FEXU.L and FEM.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FEXU.L is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FEXU.L is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEM.L.

FEXU.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FEM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. FEXU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FEXU.L and 0.80% for FEM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEXU.L and FEM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer