FEXD.L vs. CIBR.L
FEXD.L (First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B) and CIBR.L (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - FEXD.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while CIBR.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FEXD.L returned 10.82%/yr vs 15.81%/yr for CIBR.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEXD.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.L.
Performance
FEXD.L vs. CIBR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FEXD.L is traded in GBp, while CIBR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CIBR.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEXD.L achieves a 14.06% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR.L's 25.53% return.
FEXD.L
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 14.06%
- 6M
- 14.03%
- 1Y
- 28.95%
- 3Y*
- 16.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
CIBR.L
- 1D
- -2.60%
- 1M
- 29.75%
- YTD
- 25.53%
- 6M
- 20.36%
- 1Y
- 22.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 15.81%
- 10Y*
- —
FEXD.L vs. CIBR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEXD.L First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B | 14.06% | 6.55% | 17.43% | 7.00% | -3.00% | 26.00% | 14.78% |
CIBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | 25.53% | -0.09% | 21.03% | 33.79% | -18.91% | 20.71% | 24.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEXD.L and CIBR.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020 | 0.47 |
The correlation between FEXD.L and CIBR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEXD.L vs. CIBR.L — Risk / Return Rank
FEXD.L
CIBR.L
FEXD.L vs. CIBR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B (FEXD.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEXD.L | CIBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.18 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.72 | 0.93 | +7.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.19 | 2.11 | +26.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEXD.L | CIBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19 | 0.88 | +2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.67 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.69 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
FEXD.L vs. CIBR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEXD.L drawdown since its inception was -31.91%, which is greater than CIBR.L's maximum drawdown of -26.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEXD.L and CIBR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEXD.L | CIBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.91% | -26.65% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.52% | -24.29% | +19.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.63% | -25.48% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.63% | -26.65% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -3.05% | +2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -9.33% | +4.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.88% | 10.68% | -5.80% |
Volatility
FEXD.L vs. CIBR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B (FEXD.L) is 3.73%, while First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) has a volatility of 12.21%. This indicates that FEXD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEXD.L | CIBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 12.21% | -8.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.14% | 22.57% | -13.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.33% | 25.58% | -13.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 23.70% | -7.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 23.78% | -5.02% |
FEXD.L vs. CIBR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEXD.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEXD.L vs. CIBR.L - Dividend Comparison
FEXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while CIBR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FEXD.L First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEXD.L and CIBR.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIBR.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIBR.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FEXD.L.
FEXD.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CIBR.L is Technology Equities. FEXD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while CIBR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FEXD.L and 0.60% for CIBR.L.
Find the right allocation for FEXD.L and CIBR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer