FEX vs. EQL
FEX (First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund) and EQL (ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FEX tracks the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Large Cap Core Index while EQL tracks the NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEX returned 12.82%/yr vs 12.40%/yr for EQL. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FEX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for EQL.
Performance
FEX vs. EQL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEX achieves a 16.59% return, which is significantly higher than EQL's 11.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FEX having a 12.82% annualized return and EQL not far behind at 12.40%.
FEX
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 11.73%
- YTD
- 16.59%
- 1Y
- 26.18%
- 3Y*
- 18.57%
- 5Y*
- 10.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.64%
EQL
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- YTD
- 11.79%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.68%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.24M | $2.89M | $2.73M | |
| $3.97M | $3.32M | $3.45M |
FEX vs. EQL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEX First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 16.59% | 15.05% | 17.07% | 14.31% | -11.86% | 26.83% | 14.28% | 26.93% | -9.89% | 21.41% |
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 11.79% | 13.09% | 16.44% | 16.87% | -10.72% | 29.32% | 10.87% | 27.87% | -6.12% | 18.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEX and EQL is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2009 | 0.93 |
The correlation between FEX and EQL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
FEX vs. EQL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEX
EQL
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
FEX
EQL
Industrials
FEX
EQL
Financial Services
FEX
EQL
Healthcare
FEX
EQL
Consumer Cyclical
FEX
EQL
Utilities
FEX
EQL
Energy
FEX
EQL
Real Estate
FEX
EQL
Consumer Defensive
FEX
EQL
Basic Materials
FEX
EQL
Communication Services
FEX
EQL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEX vs. EQL — Risk / Return Rank
FEX
EQL
FEX vs. EQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FEX) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEX | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.38 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 3.16 | +1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.07 | 12.39 | +1.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEX vs. EQL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEX drawdown since its inception was -58.81%, which is greater than EQL's maximum drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEX and EQL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEX | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.81% | -35.65% | -23.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | -6.19% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.58% | -15.07% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.27% | -19.24% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.51% | -35.65% | -3.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | 0.00% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -3.23% | -4.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 1.58% | +0.29% |
Volatility
FEX vs. EQL - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FEX) has a higher volatility of 2.89% compared to ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) at 2.29%. This indicates that FEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEX | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 2.29% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 7.09% | +2.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.28% | 9.47% | +3.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 14.52% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 16.49% | +2.08% |
FEX vs. EQL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than EQL's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEX vs. EQL - Dividend Comparison
FEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than EQL's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 1.34% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 2.39% | 1.97% | 2.89% | 2.07% |
FEX First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 0.94% | 1.10% | 1.18% | 1.38% | 1.61% | 0.80% | 1.21% | 1.32% | 1.34% | 1.07% | 1.29% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEX and EQL have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEX has higher volatility (2.89%) compared to EQL (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEX dropped -58.81% vs EQL's -35.65%.
On 10-year performance, FEX leads with 12.82% vs 12.40% for EQL. On fees, EQL is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, EQL has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FEX has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 12.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQL is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FEX.
EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.94% for FEX.
FEX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Large Cap Core Index, while EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FEX and 0.27% for EQL.
EQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEX and EQL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer