FEX.L vs. CSUS.L
FEX.L (First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A USD) and CSUS.L (iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from First Trust and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEX.L returned 13.40%/yr vs 15.50%/yr for CSUS.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEX.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CSUS.L.
Performance
FEX.L vs. CSUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FEX.L is traded in GBp, while CSUS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEX.L achieves a 17.11% return, which is significantly higher than CSUS.L's 10.48% return. Over the past 10 years, FEX.L has underperformed CSUS.L with an annualized return of 13.40%, while CSUS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.50% annualized return.
FEX.L
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 5.08%
- YTD
- 17.11%
- 6M
- 17.37%
- 1Y
- 31.47%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.24%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
CSUS.L
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 6M
- 10.43%
- 1Y
- 27.10%
- 3Y*
- 19.51%
- 5Y*
- 13.56%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
FEX.L vs. CSUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEX.L First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A USD | 17.11% | 7.34% | 18.68% | 8.36% | -1.83% | 28.60% | 9.66% | 22.13% | -5.90% | 10.65% |
CSUS.L iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc | 10.48% | 8.87% | 27.48% | 21.30% | -10.63% | 28.27% | 16.77% | 25.42% | -0.23% | 10.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEX.L and CSUS.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2013 | 0.85 |
The correlation between FEX.L and CSUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FEX.L vs. CSUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEX.L
CSUS.L
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
FEX.L
CSUS.L
Industrials
FEX.L
CSUS.L
Financial Services
FEX.L
CSUS.L
Healthcare
FEX.L
CSUS.L
Consumer Cyclical
FEX.L
CSUS.L
Utilities
FEX.L
CSUS.L
Energy
FEX.L
CSUS.L
Real Estate
FEX.L
CSUS.L
Consumer Defensive
FEX.L
CSUS.L
Basic Materials
FEX.L
CSUS.L
Communication Services
FEX.L
CSUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEX.L vs. CSUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
FEX.L
CSUS.L
FEX.L vs. CSUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A USD (FEX.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc (CSUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEX.L | CSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.39 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.85 | 3.47 | +3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.62 | 11.32 | +10.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEX.L vs. CSUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEX.L drawdown since its inception was -36.86%, which is greater than CSUS.L's maximum drawdown of -26.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEX.L and CSUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEX.L | CSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.86% | -26.52% | -10.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.63% | -7.68% | +3.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.34% | -21.55% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.34% | -21.55% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.58% | -26.52% | -5.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -0.57% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.92% | -3.44% | -4.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 2.36% | -0.89% |
Volatility
FEX.L vs. CSUS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A USD (FEX.L) is 3.49%, while iShares VII plc - iShares MSCI USA ETF USD Acc (CSUS.L) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that FEX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEX.L | CSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 3.87% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | 9.19% | -1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.07% | 12.36% | -1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 15.79% | -1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 16.48% | -0.13% |
FEX.L vs. CSUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEX.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUS.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEX.L vs. CSUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FEX.L nor CSUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FEX.L and CSUS.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSUS.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSUS.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FEX.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FEX.L and 0.33% for CSUS.L.
Find the right allocation for FEX.L and CSUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer