PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEX.L vs. BBSU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEX.L vs. BBSU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A USD (FEX.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEX.L achieves a 14.44% return, which is significantly higher than BBSU.L's 10.23% return.


FEX.L

1D
0.52%
1M
5.95%
YTD
14.44%
6M
15.16%
1Y
30.58%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
12.02%
10Y*
13.68%

BBSU.L

1D
-0.24%
1M
5.92%
YTD
10.23%
6M
10.11%
1Y
28.53%
3Y*
19.35%
5Y*
14.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEX.L vs. BBSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FEX.L
First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A USD
14.44%7.34%18.68%8.36%-1.83%28.60%9.66%7.43%
BBSU.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)
10.23%9.39%27.19%20.71%-10.46%29.25%16.07%11.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FEX.L and BBSU.L is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019

0.88

The correlation between FEX.L and BBSU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FEX.L vs. BBSU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEX.L
BBSU.L

Technology

21.0%
35.4%

Industrials

18.8%
8.4%

Financial Services

14.0%
11.8%

Healthcare

8.9%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
10.1%

Utilities

7.3%
2.3%

Energy

6.0%
3.6%

Real Estate

4.6%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.8%

Communication Services

3.4%
11.5%

Basic Materials

3.4%
1.7%

Technology

FEX.L
21.0%
BBSU.L
35.4%

Industrials

FEX.L
18.8%
BBSU.L
8.4%

Financial Services

FEX.L
14.0%
BBSU.L
11.8%

Healthcare

FEX.L
8.9%
BBSU.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FEX.L
8.3%
BBSU.L
10.1%

Utilities

FEX.L
7.3%
BBSU.L
2.3%

Energy

FEX.L
6.0%
BBSU.L
3.6%

Real Estate

FEX.L
4.6%
BBSU.L
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

FEX.L
4.4%
BBSU.L
4.8%

Communication Services

FEX.L
3.4%
BBSU.L
11.5%

Basic Materials

FEX.L
3.4%
BBSU.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEX.L vs. BBSU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEX.L
FEX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FEX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FEX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BBSU.L
BBSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEX.L vs. BBSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A USD (FEX.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEX.LBBSU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.50

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.57

3.64

+2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.88

12.70

+8.18

FEX.L vs. BBSU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is comparable to the BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEX.L and BBSU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEX.LBBSU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

2.70

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

1.00

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.96

-0.12

Drawdowns

FEX.L vs. BBSU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEX.L drawdown since its inception was -31.58%, which is greater than BBSU.L's maximum drawdown of -25.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEX.L and BBSU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEX.LBBSU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.58%

-25.80%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.63%

-7.80%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.34%

-21.42%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.34%

-21.42%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.24%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-3.73%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

2.24%

-0.78%

Volatility

FEX.L vs. BBSU.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A USD (FEX.L) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) at 2.63%. This indicates that FEX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEX.LBBSU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

2.63%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.23%

7.21%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.85%

10.61%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

14.45%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.45%

16.11%

+0.34%

FEX.L vs. BBSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEX.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSU.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEX.L vs. BBSU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEX.L nor BBSU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FEX.L and BBSU.L have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBSU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBSU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FEX.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FEX.L and 0.05% for BBSU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEX.L and BBSU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer